Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stew Peters: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:29, 7 August 2022

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Oppose as nominator has provided no evidence explaining their rationale. I may change my mind if it can be shown that notability isn't reached. Doug Weller talk 08:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose-What evidence supports the claim that this article does not meet notability? 2601:283:100:F9B0:5DB6:2167:28CA:5A2B (talk) 14:29, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 08:18, 5 August 2022 edit Doug Weller (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Oversighters, Administrators 262,480 edits →Stew Peters: O, no evidence given by nom ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:29, 7 August 2022 edit undo 2601:283:100:f9b0:5db6:2167:28ca:5a2b (talk) →Stew Peters: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	*'''Oppose''' as nominator has provided no evidence explaining their rationale. I may change my mind if it can be shown that notability isn't reached. [[User:Doug Weller\|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller\|talk]] 08:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)		*'''Oppose''' as nominator has provided no evidence explaining their rationale. I may change my mind if it can be shown that notability isn't reached. [[User:Doug Weller\|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller\|talk]] 08:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

			:Oppose-What evidence supports the claim that this article does not meet notability? [[Special:Contributions/2601:283:100:F9B0:5DB6:2167:28CA:5A2B\|2601:283:100:F9B0:5DB6:2167:28CA:5A2B]] ([[User talk:2601:283:100:F9B0:5DB6:2167:28CA:5A2B\|talk]]) 14:29, 7 August 2022 (UTC)