Talk:Venus: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:41, 28 January 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Venus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 60 days

A news item involving Venus was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 15 September 2020.

Wikipedia

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Template:Vital article

Venus is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Venus is part of the Solar System series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 28, 2005.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 11, 2004	Featured article candidate	Promoted
May 10, 2006	Featured article review	Demoted
June 16, 2006	Featured article candidate	Promoted
October 15, 2006	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
January 8, 2008	Featured article review	Kept
August 27, 2008	Featured topic candidate	Not promoted
June 26, 2016	Featured article review	Kept
June 13, 2021	Featured topic removal candidate	Demoted
June 20, 2022	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
Current status: Featured article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Astronomy: Astronomical objects FA‑class Top‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Astronomy: Solar System

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Volcanoes FA‑class High‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WP1.0

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Venus. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Venus at the Reference desk.

There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "Important".

Presence of Phosphine on Venus

The statement "By late October 2020, re-analysis of data with a proper subtraction of background did not result in the detection of phosphine" seems to have now itself been rendered outdated by the original team^[1] who has now found a smaller amount of phosphine but still seems to have found phosphine none the less. Maybe amending this section to say the status of phosphine is still uncertain considering the multiple contradictory analyses of the atmosphere are now available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmesco17 (talk • contribs)

References

^ Greaves, Jane. "Re-analysis of Phosphine in Venus' Clouds". arXiv. Retrieved 16 Nov 2020.

Reference location

Maintaining this article is more difficult than necessary because of the extensive gunk in the form of inline citations and notes. It would be much simpler if the citations and notes were transferred to the reflist template containers. I'd like to propose making this migration happen so this FA can be more readily kept up to date. Does anybody object? Right now it's a mixture of inline references with references in the templates, so it would just be a matter of migrating the remainder. Praemonitus (talk) 14:50, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, there are no objections. Praemonitus (talk) 17:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

- - - - concern over scientists/science writers describing the Venusian surface as "hell" or hellish ****

In archive 3--- some mocked the description and asked for references. In literature of the 1960s/70s after it was found to be 800+ degrees F....it was indeed quite usual to call it hellish.

https://www.science.org/content/article/armed-tough-computer-chips-scientists-are-ready-return-hell-venus

https://www.cnet.com/science/venus-is-hell-but-science-is-seriously-looking-for-life-in-its-skies/

https://spacenews.com/is-venus-a-living-hell-conversation-with-astrobiologist-david-grinspoon/

Chesspride216.144.161.51 (talk) 01:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Greaves, Jane. "Re-analysis of Phosphine in Venus' Clouds". arXiv. Retrieved 16 Nov 2020.

[1]

@@ Line 89: / Line 89: @@
 Maintaining this article is more difficult than necessary because of the extensive gunk in the form of inline citations and notes. It would be much simpler if the citations and notes were transferred to the reflist template containers. I'd like to propose making this migration happen so this FA can be more readily kept up to date. Does anybody object? Right now it's a mixture of inline references with references in the templates, so it would just be a matter of migrating the remainder. [[User:Praemonitus|Praemonitus]] ([[User talk:Praemonitus|talk]]) 14:50, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 : Okay, there are no objections. [[User:Praemonitus|Praemonitus]] ([[User talk:Praemonitus|talk]]) 17:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
+***** concern over scientists/science writers describing the Venusian surface as "hell" or hellish ****
+In archive 3--- some mocked the description and asked for references.  In literature of the 1960s/70s after it was found to be 800+ degrees F....it was indeed quite usual to call it hellish.
+https://www.science.org/content/article/armed-tough-computer-chips-scientists-are-ready-return-hell-venus
+https://www.cnet.com/science/venus-is-hell-but-science-is-seriously-looking-for-life-in-its-skies/
+https://spacenews.com/is-venus-a-living-hell-conversation-with-astrobiologist-david-grinspoon/
+Chesspride[[Special:Contributions/216.144.161.51|216.144.161.51]] ([[User talk:216.144.161.51|talk]]) 01:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC)