Template:Did you know nominations/Desert of Maine: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
removed a youtube reference see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--> |
--> |
||
* ... that the |
* ... that there is a "desert" in the U.S state of Maine called the {{Desert of Maine|Desert of Maine}}? <small>Source: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/why-desert-middle-maine-180951555/ |
||
** ''Reviewed'': |
** ''Reviewed'': |
||
<small>Improved to Good Article status by {{user0|AverageEstoniaEnthusiast}}. Self-nominated at 23:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom [[User:GalliumBot#darn|will be logged]] at [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Desert of Maine]]; consider [[Help:Watchlist|watching]] this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.</small> |
<small>Improved to Good Article status by {{user0|AverageEstoniaEnthusiast}}. Self-nominated at 23:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom [[User:GalliumBot#darn|will be logged]] at [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Desert of Maine]]; consider [[Help:Watchlist|watching]] this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.</small> |
Revision as of 03:45, 21 February 2023
DYK toolbox |
---|
Desert of Maine
- ... that there is a "desert" in the U.S state of Maine called the Template:Desert of Maine? Source: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/why-desert-middle-maine-180951555/
- Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by AverageEstoniaEnthusiast (talk). Self-nominated at 23:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Desert of Maine; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Drive-by comment (not a full review): (1) "only desert in New England" does not appear in the article, and needs to before this hook can be approved; (2) quora is not a reliable source, and neither is the YouTube video used as a reference in the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)
AverageEstoniaEnthusiast Welcome. Regarding the hook it is catchy and would be a quirky hook, however it needs to be in the article. The article has the correct inline citations and is neutral. Recently promoted to GA so it fits our criteria for inclusion. First DYK nomination so a QPQ is not needed. Since there is no RS which states the hook it needs a reference. The article and hook are interesting. In addition to the hook I have a concern about a copyright violation, the detector picks up. See here. Bruxton (talk) 02:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Noted, I will address your comments once I have some time to do so. - AverageEstoniaEnthusiast (talk) 03:41, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
It's pretty clear the article of copyright concern is copypasta that takes most of its material from WP, most of the rest from sources referenced here. Alot of the material in question has been on WP for years, while the article of concern is only a little more than a year old. Crescent77 (talk) 03:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- I removed a youtube reference see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Bruxton (talk) 18:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)