Talk:RPO-A Shmel: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:25, 17 March 2023

Russia: Technology & engineering / Military Start‑class Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

I believe this would be better described as an anti-personnel rocket rather than as a flamethrower. Any thoughts on this?

I guess its both. Sort of. Wachholder0 19:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I can't see how this 1) is classified as a flamethrower 2) and not a rocket launcher. But I'm no expert. Ashanthalas 21:45, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The russian army classified this weapon as a flame thrower, so there is nothing wrong with this category. Mieciu K 16:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is a thermobaric rather than than an explosive weapon intended to penetrate hard targets. Not exactly what in called a flamethrower in American English, but that's what the Russians are calling it.Wachholder0 18:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are we sure that's not a translation problem? Because regardless of how the Russians classify it that's a rocket launcher, not a flame thrower. I would say it's very misleading to not use the proper English term simply because simply because the Russians use a different word that may or may not have different connotations in Russian. 66.131.254.21 06:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see some info on when this was developed and when it was deployed to troops. Anyone knows and can add that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.235.121.24 (talk) 05:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The way I understand it, the RPO was developed to replace "classic" WW2 flamethrowers (and did so too), that's why, from a tactical POV, and historically, it is considered and called a flamethrower. --92.202.77.215 (talk) 20:25, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bear in mind Wikipedia does not necessarily need to repeat in English what other languages literally call things. The Russian name for a machine-gun, "пулемёт," literally means "bullet-thrower". When the term "огнемёт" refers to a rocket-assisted thermobaric bomb fired from a shoulder-mounted launcher, it should not perhaps be called a "flame-thrower". 65.93.108.175 (talk) 17:25, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on RPO-A Shmel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:38, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on RPO-A Shmel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131022041838/http://www.kbptula.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=309&Itemid=653&lang=en to http://kbptula.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=309&Itemid=653&lang=en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 The way I understand it, the RPO was developed to replace "classic" WW2 flamethrowers (and did so too), that's why, from a tactical POV, and historically, it is considered and called a flamethrower. --[[Special:Contributions/92.202.77.215|92.202.77.215]] ([[User talk:92.202.77.215|talk]]) 20:25, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
+Bear in mind Wikipedia does not necessarily need to repeat in English what other languages literally call things. The Russian name for a machine-gun, "пулемёт," literally means "bullet-thrower". When the term "огнемёт" refers to a rocket-assisted thermobaric bomb fired from a shoulder-mounted launcher, it should not perhaps be called a "flame-thrower". [[Special:Contributions/65.93.108.175|65.93.108.175]] ([[User talk:65.93.108.175|talk]]) 17:25, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 == External links modified ==