Cab-rank rule: Difference between revisions
Javert2113 (talk | contribs) Adding short description: "English legal obligation to accept clients" |
Add Independent Report and press release Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Without the cab-rank rule, an unpopular person might not get legal representation; barristers who acted for them might be criticised for doing so. |
Without the cab-rank rule, an unpopular person might not get legal representation; barristers who acted for them might be criticised for doing so. |
||
Addressing the continued necessity for the rule in 2010, the [[Law Society of England and Wales]], which represents solicitors |
Addressing the continued necessity for the rule in 2010, the [[Law Society of England and Wales]], which represents solicitors said: |
||
{{quote |
{{quote |
||
|text=The Society questions whether the cab-rank rule remains a necessary and proportionate rule for the Bar at a time when there is increasing competition for advocacy services. |
|text=The Society questions whether the cab-rank rule remains a necessary and proportionate rule for the Bar at a time when there is increasing competition for advocacy services. |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|source=[[General Council of the Bar|The Bar Council]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.barcouncil.org.uk/assets/documents/Summary%20Consultation%20Terms%20of%20Work.pdf |title=Summary of Responses to the Bar Council 2010 Consultation on Contractual Terms of Work for the supply of Legal Services by Barristers to Solicitors |publisher=General Council of the Bar |page=19 |year=2010 |accessdate=28 June 2011 }}{{Dead link|date=June 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> |
|source=[[General Council of the Bar|The Bar Council]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.barcouncil.org.uk/assets/documents/Summary%20Consultation%20Terms%20of%20Work.pdf |title=Summary of Responses to the Bar Council 2010 Consultation on Contractual Terms of Work for the supply of Legal Services by Barristers to Solicitors |publisher=General Council of the Bar |page=19 |year=2010 |accessdate=28 June 2011 }}{{Dead link|date=June 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
In response to the Law Society report the [[Bar Standards Board]] commissioned an independent report. |
|||
On 26 Mar 2013 the [[Bar Standards Board]] issued a press release titled |
|||
[https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/resources/resource-library/removal-of-the--cab-rank--rule-a-major-threat-to-justice.html Removal of the ‘cab rank’ rule a major threat to justice] which includes the following statements: |
|||
* "the cab rank rule is fundamental to justice" |
|||
* "The BSB report shows that the rule protects barristers from the wrath of the community and the social stigma that might arise from representing an unpopular defendant." |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Revision as of 17:49, 4 April 2023
In English law (and other countries which adopt the rule), the cab-rank rule is the obligation of a barrister to accept any work in a field in which they profess themselves competent to practise, at a court at which they normally appear, and at their usual rates. The rule derives its name from the tradition by which a hackney carriage driver at the head of a queue of taxicabs is obliged to take the first passenger requesting a ride.
The cab rank rule is set out at rC29 of the Bar Standards Board Handbook. It states that if the barrister receives instructions from a professional client and the instructions are appropriate taking into account their experience, seniority and/or field of practice, they must (subject to the exceptions in rC30) accept those instructions irrespective of:
- The identity of the client;
- The nature of the case to which the instructions relate;
- Whether the client is paying privately or is publicly funded; and
- Any belief or opinion which you may have formed as to the character, reputation, cause, conduct, guilt or innocence of the client.[1]
Without the cab-rank rule, an unpopular person might not get legal representation; barristers who acted for them might be criticised for doing so.
Addressing the continued necessity for the rule in 2010, the Law Society of England and Wales, which represents solicitors said:
The Society questions whether the cab-rank rule remains a necessary and proportionate rule for the Bar at a time when there is increasing competition for advocacy services.
In response to the Law Society report the Bar Standards Board commissioned an independent report.
On 26 Mar 2013 the Bar Standards Board issued a press release titled Removal of the ‘cab rank’ rule a major threat to justice which includes the following statements:
- "the cab rank rule is fundamental to justice"
- "The BSB report shows that the rule protects barristers from the wrath of the community and the social stigma that might arise from representing an unpopular defendant."
See also
References
- ^ "Guidance on the Cab Rank Rule" (PDF). Code of Conduct of the Bar of England & Wales. Bar Standards Board. 2 September 2015. Retrieved 12 October 2016.
- ^ "Summary of Responses to the Bar Council 2010 Consultation on Contractual Terms of Work for the supply of Legal Services by Barristers to Solicitors" (PDF). General Council of the Bar. 2010. p. 19. Retrieved 28 June 2011.[permanent dead link]
 | This law-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |