Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramit Sethi (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 23:48, 25 April 2023

Ramit Sethi

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

- Article written like an advertisement

- Nearly all claims are unsourced or fail verification

- Blogger has strong incentives to create an internet presence for selling personal finance advice

- Blogger has written for finance-related publications, but these are known for allowing authors to purchase articles: Motley Fool, CNBC Money, Forbes

- Wedding in a newspaper does not qualify as notability; newspapers weddings are often chosen for human interest and not the notability of the couple DenverCoder9 (talk) 23:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very promo. Subject is good at talking about things in media, but no sources discuss him. One of many "experts" in the field of getting rich. Oaktree b (talk) 03:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't we just delete everyone. Wikipedia has tons of misinformation on the web site. Everyone has to find something wrong with everything. Just take Wikipedia down then there will never be anymore controversy. I have looked up multiple things which I knew a little bit about (don't ask what it was because I don't remember) and the info I knew was correct was not. I say take the whole web site down for misinformation. Lets add shut the freeways down because of the bill boards. Is the freeway driving, not for putting out advertising. So what if he is using a platform. Maybe you're just jealous!!!! 98.167.122.201 (talk) 23:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 *<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Businesspeople|list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 02:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Delete''' Very promo. Subject is good at talking about things in media, but no sources discuss him. One of many "experts" in the field of getting rich. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 03:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
+*:Why don't we just delete everyone. Wikipedia has tons of misinformation on the web site. Everyone has to find something wrong with everything. Just take Wikipedia down then there will never be anymore controversy. I have looked up multiple things which I knew a little bit about (don't ask what it was because I don't remember) and the info I knew was correct was not. I say take the whole web site down for misinformation. Lets add shut the freeways down because of the bill boards. Is the freeway driving, not for putting out advertising. So what if he is using a platform. Maybe you're just jealous!!!! [[Special:Contributions/98.167.122.201|98.167.122.201]] ([[User talk:98.167.122.201|talk]]) 23:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC)