Talk:Stephen B. Levine: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:37, 27 April 2023

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Science and Academia C‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Sexology and sexuality C‑class Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Medicine: Society / Psychiatry C‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 05:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Levine (psychiatrist) → Stephen B. Levine — Using his middle initial better diambiguates him from another author/healer with the same name — Jokestress (talk) 15:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion

Any additional comments:

At this point, I am abstaining from !voting. However, shouldn't the other S. Levine article be dabbed as (poet) not (author), since they are both authors? DigitalC (talk) 06:42, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They are both authors and both healers (in different senses), but I believe one who does poetry is better known for his therapeutic work than his poetry. That's what made this a little complicated. What would be ideal is finding out his middle initial. Jokestress (talk) 18:27, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unless this Stephen Levine was known by Stephen B. Levine, I don't believe this dab is appropriate. JPG-GR (talk) 00:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's how he is credited on all his books and articles (i.e. this.) Jokestress (talk) 00:21, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Silent Reversion and Talk Page Reversion?

@Dronebogus About your improper removal of my contribution to the article and question to you, the person who reverted my edit, from the talk page

1. "I don’t know what this is about but this is the wrong forum" - WP:Talk_page_guidelines disagrees with you and places the obligation on you when your reversion is called into question: "Discuss edits: The talk page is particularly useful to talk about edits. If one of your edits has been reverted, and you change it back again, it is good practice to leave an explanation on the talk page and a note in the edit summary that you have done so. The talk page is also the place to ask about another editor's changes. If someone questions one of your edits, make sure you reply with a full, helpful rationale.

2. Per the above, I will be undoing your reversion with the rationale that 1. I have already explained in the prior comment on this talk page, and 2. you have failed to meet a simple request for justification after I made an edit to bring the wording of the article closer to the provided sources and further away from WP:Libel, which is not something I would quite invoke here, but which I believe merits mention. If you seek to revert again, I would encourage you to seek a single other user's opinion or perhaps do your due diligence of responding to my question of your edit which you purged from the talk page. 49.186.63.35 (talk) 03:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 :That's how he is credited on all his books and articles (i.e. [http://books.google.com/books?id=Q8sTRB_ybDwC&dq=Stephen+B.+Levine&ei=s_h3SJrtPKLgtAPt16HiBw&client=firefox-a. this].) [[User:Jokestress|Jokestress]] ([[User talk:Jokestress|talk]]) 00:21, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:pollbottom -->
+== Silent Reversion and Talk Page Reversion? ==
+@[[User:Dronebogus|Dronebogus]] About your improper removal of my contribution to the article and question to you, the person who reverted my edit, ''from the talk page''
+. "[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stephen_B._Levine&action=history I don’t know what this is about but this is the wrong forum]" - [[WP:Talk_page_guidelines]] disagrees with you and places the obligation on ''you'' when your reversion is called into question: "Discuss edits: The talk page is particularly useful to talk about edits. If one of your edits has been reverted, and you change it back again, it is good practice to leave an explanation on the talk page and a note in the edit summary that you have done so. '''The talk page is also the place to ask about another editor's changes. If someone questions one of your edits, make sure you reply with a full, helpful rationale.'''
+. Per the above, I will be undoing your reversion with the rationale that 1. I have already explained in the prior comment on this talk page, and 2. you have failed to meet a simple request for justification after I made an edit to bring the wording of the article closer to the provided sources and further away from [[WP:Libel]], which is not something I would quite invoke here, but which I believe merits mention. If you seek to revert again, I would encourage you to seek a single other user's opinion or perhaps do your due diligence of responding to my question of your edit which you purged from the talk page. [[Special:Contributions/49.186.63.35|49.186.63.35]] ([[User talk:49.186.63.35|talk]]) 03:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)