User talk:Tzaquiel

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 21:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Robert F. Kennedy Jr.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 22:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Tzaquiel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand that I may have run afoul of 3RR, but I need it to be known that at no point did I approach anything resembling 'damage or disruption.' A review will show that I have been providing citations and references, while the same user who mass-deleted my edits immediately sent me a warning when I reverted their change for the first time. I believe that my block should be lifted firstly because I have some time this weekend and this is how I'd like to use it, and secondly because I have been reported by a rascal. I've been on Wikipedia for a very long time and this is the first time I've ever had any issue like this. - Tzaquiel (talk) 23:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand that I may have run afoul of 3RR, but I need it to be known that at no point did I approach anything resembling 'damage or disruption.' A review will show that I have been providing citations and references, while the same user who mass-deleted my edits immediately sent me a warning when I reverted their change ''for the first time''. I believe that my block should be lifted firstly because I have some time this weekend and this is how I'd like to use it, and secondly because I have been reported by a rascal. I've been on Wikipedia for a very long time and this is the first time I've ever had any issue like this. - [[User:Tzaquiel|Tzaquiel]] ([[User talk:Tzaquiel#top|talk]]) 23:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that I may have run afoul of 3RR, but I need it to be known that at no point did I approach anything resembling 'damage or disruption.' A review will show that I have been providing citations and references, while the same user who mass-deleted my edits immediately sent me a warning when I reverted their change ''for the first time''. I believe that my block should be lifted firstly because I have some time this weekend and this is how I'd like to use it, and secondly because I have been reported by a rascal. I've been on Wikipedia for a very long time and this is the first time I've ever had any issue like this. - [[User:Tzaquiel|Tzaquiel]] ([[User talk:Tzaquiel#top|talk]]) 23:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that I may have run afoul of 3RR, but I need it to be known that at no point did I approach anything resembling 'damage or disruption.' A review will show that I have been providing citations and references, while the same user who mass-deleted my edits immediately sent me a warning when I reverted their change ''for the first time''. I believe that my block should be lifted firstly because I have some time this weekend and this is how I'd like to use it, and secondly because I have been reported by a rascal. I've been on Wikipedia for a very long time and this is the first time I've ever had any issue like this. - [[User:Tzaquiel|Tzaquiel]] ([[User talk:Tzaquiel#top|talk]]) 23:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}