Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
the request was withdrawn by the filing party 13 hours ago
Tags: Replaced Undo
Bijou1995 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=auto</noinclude>}}
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=auto</noinclude>}}
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>

== Threatened to be blocked and my disabilities, faith and authenticity have been thrown into the shade. ==
'''Initiated by ''' [[User:Bijou1995|Bijou1995]] ([[User talk:Bijou1995|talk]]) '''at''' 15:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

=== Involved parties ===
<!-- Please change "userlinks" to "admin" if the party is an administrator -->
*{{userlinks|Bijou1995}}, ''filing party''
*{{userlinks|Bishonen}}
*{{userlinks|Tryptofish}}
*{{userlinks|2603:8001:9C00:F4FE:AC8B:C2A5:264F:4354}}

;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. -->
*[diff of notification Bishonen]
*[diff of notification Tryptofish]
*[diff of notification 2603:8001:9C00:F4FE:AC8B:C2A5:264F:4354]

;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried
* Link 1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#c-Bishonen-20230527084100-Bijou1995-20230525115100
* Link 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bijou1995#c-Bishonen-20230527084800-Warning%3A_no_more_personal_attacks
* Link 3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ARoseWolf#c-Bishonen-20230530110700-Bijou1995-20230530100500



Hi there, I am compelled to write this statement as I feel I have been bullied by other editors, I put together an investigation into iloveapphysics as I had removed a suspension on an account, for some reason it bothered me as they reverted it so I looked into them and felt I had discovered some edit wars and this editor appeared to defame others ( not sure if that the right terminology but that's what I used). I noticed they wrote negative stuff about politicians and high fliers ie adding the family were criminals on the ac which I felt was irrelevant and unfair. I mentioned these other victims as I called them alongside my edit adam leitman bailey, I just thought it warranted an investigation.... anyway I do have fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue so becoming an editor was a lifesaver as I can do it in my own time. My illness, faith and authenticity all appear to been met with rather aggressive comments and a threat to be blocked. i don't understand why other editors have to be so rude and hurtful and accusatory - I believe I have been called a sockpuppet, inept, a liar, and other nasty comments in their replies. The thing is I live in the UK please feel free to do a check, I am a 57-year-old email living with those conditions which I can prove. I now feel as though I don't have freedom of speech and feel I've been bullied into submission. I have no connection with any of the victims I just thought I was doing a good thing. I originally wrote to the noticeboard/incidents group and ask them to look into the ac of illoveapphysics but everyone seems to think I am fake, maybe my reasons for removing the suspension and trying to get justice for the victims were wrong, emotional etc but I don't think I serve to be spoken to like that and accused of being this, that or the other. I don't wish to lose my ac as it keeps me busy but I feel I have no choice but to contact you on here as I have no support whatsoever and feel upset by these reactions. I may have made mistakes and used wrong terminology, I have been building my confidence since I started but I shall never attempt anything like this again as this has destroyed my confidence.

Thank you
[[User:Bijou1995|Bijou1995]] ([[User talk:Bijou1995|talk]]) 15:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Maximum of 500 words (you can use http://www.wordcounter.net/ to check).
You should use diffs and links to support the case you are making, and try to convince the arbitrators that the dispute requires their intervention. You are not trying to exhaustively prove your case at this time; if your case is accepted for arbitration, an evidence page will be created that you can use to provide more detail.

Conflict/pattern of behaviour/defamation - (title)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents

*ATTENTION:*

*Once you have entered all required information into this template, preview and then save it. It will place the request in a new section at the bottom of [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case]].
*You must inform all parties that they have been named in this request using <nowiki>{{subst:arbcom notice|CASENAME}}</nowiki>.
*Once you have done this provide the diff of the notification in the area provided.

*If you have any questions or problems please ask a clerk for help or post on [[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks]].

-->

=== Statement by Bijou1995 ===

=== Statement by Bishonen ===

=== Statement by Tryptofish ===
=== Statement by 2603:8001:9C00:F4FE:AC8B:C2A5:264F:4354 ===
=== Statement by {Non-party} ===
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
<!-- * Please copy this section for the next person. * -->

=== Threatened to be blocked and my disabilities, faith and authenticity have been thrown into the shade.: Clerk notes ===
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).''
*

=== Threatened to be blocked and my disabilities, faith and authenticity have been thrown into the shade.: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0> ===
{{anchor|1=Threatened to be blocked and my disabilities, faith and authenticity have been thrown into the shade.: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)</small>
*

Revision as of 15:11, 30 May 2023

Requests for arbitration

Threatened to be blocked and my disabilities, faith and authenticity have been thrown into the shade.

Initiated by Bijou1995 (talk) at 15:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
  • [diff of notification Bishonen]
  • [diff of notification Tryptofish]
  • [diff of notification 2603:8001:9C00:F4FE:AC8B:C2A5:264F:4354]
Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried


Hi there, I am compelled to write this statement as I feel I have been bullied by other editors, I put together an investigation into iloveapphysics as I had removed a suspension on an account, for some reason it bothered me as they reverted it so I looked into them and felt I had discovered some edit wars and this editor appeared to defame others ( not sure if that the right terminology but that's what I used). I noticed they wrote negative stuff about politicians and high fliers ie adding the family were criminals on the ac which I felt was irrelevant and unfair. I mentioned these other victims as I called them alongside my edit adam leitman bailey, I just thought it warranted an investigation.... anyway I do have fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue so becoming an editor was a lifesaver as I can do it in my own time. My illness, faith and authenticity all appear to been met with rather aggressive comments and a threat to be blocked. i don't understand why other editors have to be so rude and hurtful and accusatory - I believe I have been called a sockpuppet, inept, a liar, and other nasty comments in their replies. The thing is I live in the UK please feel free to do a check, I am a 57-year-old email living with those conditions which I can prove. I now feel as though I don't have freedom of speech and feel I've been bullied into submission. I have no connection with any of the victims I just thought I was doing a good thing. I originally wrote to the noticeboard/incidents group and ask them to look into the ac of illoveapphysics but everyone seems to think I am fake, maybe my reasons for removing the suspension and trying to get justice for the victims were wrong, emotional etc but I don't think I serve to be spoken to like that and accused of being this, that or the other. I don't wish to lose my ac as it keeps me busy but I feel I have no choice but to contact you on here as I have no support whatsoever and feel upset by these reactions. I may have made mistakes and used wrong terminology, I have been building my confidence since I started but I shall never attempt anything like this again as this has destroyed my confidence.

Thank you Bijou1995 (talk) 15:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maximum of 500 words (you can use http://www.wordcounter.net/ to check). You should use diffs and links to support the case you are making, and try to convince the arbitrators that the dispute requires their intervention. You are not trying to exhaustively prove your case at this time; if your case is accepted for arbitration, an evidence page will be created that you can use to provide more detail.

Conflict/pattern of behaviour/defamation - (title) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents

  • ATTENTION:*
  • Once you have entered all required information into this template, preview and then save it. It will place the request in a new section at the bottom of Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case.
  • You must inform all parties that they have been named in this request using {{subst:arbcom notice|CASENAME}}.
  • Once you have done this provide the diff of the notification in the area provided.

-->

Statement by Bijou1995

Statement by Bishonen

Statement by Tryptofish

Statement by 2603:8001:9C00:F4FE:AC8B:C2A5:264F:4354

Statement by {Non-party}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

Threatened to be blocked and my disabilities, faith and authenticity have been thrown into the shade.: Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

Threatened to be blocked and my disabilities, faith and authenticity have been thrown into the shade.: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)