Talk:Sunrise Ruby: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:36, 9 June 2023

Gemology and Jewelry: Gemstones Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Gemstones subpage.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

A fact from Sunrise Ruby appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 June 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Sunrise Ruby is the world's most expensive ruby, most expensive coloured gemstone, and most expensive gemstone other than a diamond?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sunrise Ruby.

Wikipedia

photo?

Surely, there's a picture of this stone somewhere.... --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 13:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've been trying to find a free use photo but haven't had any luck. Mkdw ^talk 19:26, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Context of sale

Having the context of its sale will help explain why it received so much coverage and how it was apart of one of the largest ruby auctions to date. The sources deemed it noteworthy enough to talk about the auction and other auction pieces in the article centred around the Sunrise Ruby. Therefore relevance is loosely established and I see no valid reason why this context should be removed. It's not exactly throwing the entire balance of the article off. Mkdw ^talk 23:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When was it discovered?

Is this part of a historic collection of hundreds of years and maybe part of some people's culture or is this a recent find? Thy, SvenAERTS (talk) 03:29, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No longer number one

This ruby has been surpassed by "The Estrela de Fura", both in terms of carats and selling price https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-65853926 58.80.201.106 (talk) 23:35, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 Is this part of a historic collection of hundreds of years and maybe part of some people's culture or is this a recent find? Thy, [[User:SvenAERTS|SvenAERTS]] ([[User talk:SvenAERTS|talk]]) 03:29, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
-==No longer number one===
+==No longer number one==
 This ruby has been surpassed by "The Estrela de Fura", both in terms of carats and selling price
 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-65853926[[Special:Contributions/58.80.201.106|58.80.201.106]] ([[User talk:58.80.201.106|talk]]) 23:35, 9 June 2023 (UTC)