Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Wagner Group mutiny: Requesting extended confirmed protection of Wagner Group mutiny.
Requesting protection for Chip tuning
Line 71: Line 71:


'''Indefinite extended confirmed protection:''' [[WP:30/500|Arbitration enforcement]] – GS:RUSUKR. [[User:HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith|HappyWith]] ([[User talk:HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith|talk]]) 22:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
'''Indefinite extended confirmed protection:''' [[WP:30/500|Arbitration enforcement]] – GS:RUSUKR. [[User:HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith|HappyWith]] ([[User talk:HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith|talk]]) 22:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

=== [[Chip tuning]] ===
* {{pagelinks|Chip tuning}}
'''Reason:''' Editor(s) from multiple IPs have repeatedly added a link to "ecuflash.co", a sales site. — [[User:Greentryst|Greentryst]] <sup>[[User_talk:Greentryst|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Greentryst|C]]</sub> 22:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:46, 23 June 2023

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Some really bad behaviour going on here with respected editors almost being bullied by others. Full protection would give the edit-warring factions time to cool off and perhaps even discuss on the talk page. 10mmsocket (talk) 12:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes, the discussion on the talk page has been tense. But Exnihilox seems to have indicated they are satisfied with the outcome, and really the edit history, while it does have some strongly worded edit summaries, does not show much sign of disruptive back and forth. Daniel Case (talk) 19:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To be clear, I am totally fine with the current document. The active version now reflect more 'a Rochdale of 2023' compared to the original 2011 document. Yes, indeed the exchanges have been rather 'strong' - and some comments might be just in the nature of this kind of digital debate. I take a lot of responsibility for this. Though on review many of the 'disputes' have been fully resolved and I especially appreciated the user 'PamD's' contribution and guidance - despite some contention. The document is far more robust, far better supported and easier to read than it was three days ago. As a newcomer to the Wikipedia community - I fully comprehend I might be perceived as an outsider - I fully grasp many editors have been engaged with this project for many years. It has been a good lesson for me and I hope to contribute more to the areas I have a background in - this was very much a learning experience. Regards and thanks... Exnihilox (talk) 19:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Starring roles follow the order of screen credits. The sock Eswaran Naveen returned with unsigned IP Consistently being disruptive right now. Reverting the film cast.

[[1]]

[[2]]

[[3]]

[[4]]

[[5]] Nehansaxan (talk) 17:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Also List of Legendary Television programs List of Warner Bros. Animation productions and Skull Island (TV series). Requesting temporary semi-protection. Rotating anonymous editors persistenly adding unsourced information. Barry Wom (talk) 17:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2804:14C:598B:81CA:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent vandalism has gained some traction on twitter: https://twitter.com/OzarkChasers/status/1672109692154175489 And the controversy behind the tornado rating will lead to more trolls and vandals. Wikiwillz (talk) 17:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Many users have added useful stuff with source in past, but due to edit wars over adding the caste of subject, it gets deteriorated. Hence the pending change protection should be applied to differentiate between useful and disruptive changes. Btw, i have fixed the issue regarding caste with a reliable source, but I don't guarantee that it will remain there and no disruption will occur.- Admantine123 (talk) 18:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:18, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 20:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs changing this spelling redirect to point to an unrelated page. NebY (talk) 21:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please report them to WP:AIV or WP:ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Match protection level with parent template. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Match protection level with parent template. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – GS:RUSUKR. HappyWith (talk) 22:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Editor(s) from multiple IPs have repeatedly added a link to "ecuflash.co", a sales site. — Greentryst TC 22:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]