Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChefOnline: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:20, 7 July 2023

ChefOnline

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Online food delivery service. Sent to draft by NPP twice, both times returned to mainspace - yet still lacks RS coverage. Despite the claim in the article that the company "gained significant media attention for organizing National Curry Week between 4th to 10th May of 2020" no coverage in RS is presented (I'm discounting the Bucks Free Press and Epping Forest Guardian here). Fails WP:GNG; WP:NCORP. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet, Websites, and United Kingdom. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not meet WP:NCORP, see table below. —siro χ o 09:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table: prepared by User:siroxo
Asian Voice	press announcement			✘ No
Bangla Mirror	press announcement	~		✘ No
Delish.com			passing mention does not qualify for SIRS	✘ No
Metro	CEO quote	RSP		✘ No
Sheffield Star	executive quote	?		✘ No
Sky News	executive interview		?	✘ No
caterlyst.com	executive quote	?	routine coverage not enough for SIRS	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:13, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete source table above shows nothing qualifies as a RS, I can't find much else that would support keeping it. Oaktree b (talk) 13:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As explained in the table, WP:GNG has not been met. --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 11:20, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 13:17, 5 July 2023 edit Oaktree b (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers 24,133 edits →ChefOnline: Reply Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:20, 7 July 2023 edit undo TheInsatiableOne (talk \| contribs) 268 edits →ChefOnline Next edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	:'''Delete''' source table above shows nothing qualifies as a RS, I can't find much else that would support keeping it. [[User:Oaktree b\|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b\|talk]]) 13:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)		:'''Delete''' source table above shows nothing qualifies as a RS, I can't find much else that would support keeping it. [[User:Oaktree b\|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b\|talk]]) 13:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
			*'''Delete''' As explained in the table, [[WP:GNG]] has not been met. --[[User:TheInsatiableOne\|TheInsatiableOne]] ([[User talk:TheInsatiableOne\|talk]]) 11:20, 7 July 2023 (UTC)