Jump to content

User talk:Incompetent88: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
→‎top: accept
Line 1: Line 1:
{{unblock|reason=apologies for making a second request and I will not make another but I legitimately have no association with whoever is behind that account. I don't know what association you have made. If there was some way to know I could respond. I made an account here to report a page I know was made by somebody to promote himself, but it is still active. Wasn't sure how to do it. I haven't made any posts, edits etc,either, so not sure how that is a sock puppet [[User:Incompetent88|Incompetent88]] ([[User talk:Incompetent88#top|talk]]) 20:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed |1=apologies for making a second request and I will not make another but I legitimately have no association with whoever is behind that account. I don't know what association you have made. If there was some way to know I could respond. I made an account here to report a page I know was made by somebody to promote himself, but it is still active. Wasn't sure how to do it. I haven't made any posts, edits etc,either, so not sure how that is a sock puppet [[User:Incompetent88|Incompetent88]] ([[User talk:Incompetent88#top|talk]]) 20:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC) |accept = After some discussion with {{u|Yamla}}, I concede that I may have made a mistake in this case. Your account was created on the same narrow, quiet range that some people were using abusively, but it's possible that was just a coincidence, so I'm happy to give you the benefit of the doubt and unblock this account. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#006400;">Girth</span>&nbsp;<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#4B0082;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 10:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)}}


== Blocked as a sockpuppet ==
== Blocked as a sockpuppet ==

Revision as of 10:29, 29 July 2023

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Incompetent88 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

apologies for making a second request and I will not make another but I legitimately have no association with whoever is behind that account. I don't know what association you have made. If there was some way to know I could respond. I made an account here to report a page I know was made by somebody to promote himself, but it is still active. Wasn't sure how to do it. I haven't made any posts, edits etc,either, so not sure how that is a sock puppet Incompetent88 (talk) 20:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

After some discussion with Yamla, I concede that I may have made a mistake in this case. Your account was created on the same narrow, quiet range that some people were using abusively, but it's possible that was just a coincidence, so I'm happy to give you the benefit of the doubt and unblock this account. Girth Summit (blether) 10:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Videographer Joe 1 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Videographer Joe 1. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 18:05, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Incompetent88 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have no association at all with the account you've linked me to. This is my only account.Incompetent88 (talk) 19:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Definitely not the case that you have no association at all with Videographer Joe 1. I'm not sure I'd go as far as to say  Confirmed, but the connection is certainly closer than "no association at all". Yamla (talk) 20:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.