User talk:68.5.250.146: Difference between revisions
→March 2007: {{3RR|Amir Taheri}} WP:3RR on Amir Taheri. |
Take your own advice |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[Image:Stop hand.svg|30px|left|Warning]] |
[[Image:Stop hand.svg|30px|left|Warning]] |
||
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Amir Taheri|, as you are doing in [[:Amir Taheri]]}}. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit warring]], even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> 02:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC) |
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Amir Taheri|, as you are doing in [[:Amir Taheri]]}}. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit warring]], even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> 02:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Take your own advice == |
|||
You should take your own advice and refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Amir Taheri. You are the one who began this chirade by summarily deleting the original revisions with a revert, and continually reverting back. |
|||
You are guilty of the same alleged violation that you are threatening others with. If you would like to discuss compromise langauge, you should propose something. Likewise, the revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring either. Thanks. |
|||
Revision as of 03:28, 22 March 2007
March 2007
Thank you for experimenting with the page Amir Taheri on Wikipedia as you did with this edit. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. 21:48, March 12 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Amir Taheri, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 09:12, March 20 2007 (UTC)
Your characterization of other users' edits as "vandalism" is unwarranted and unjustified. Moreover, your summary deletions are themselves advancing non-neutral POV, which is even more unacceptable considering that you have no knowledge or experience in the subject matter that you are editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.250.146 (talk • contribs) 00:11, March 22 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Amir Taheri. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. 02:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Take your own advice
You should take your own advice and refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Amir Taheri. You are the one who began this chirade by summarily deleting the original revisions with a revert, and continually reverting back.
You are guilty of the same alleged violation that you are threatening others with. If you would like to discuss compromise langauge, you should propose something. Likewise, the revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring either. Thanks.