Talk:Trifluoromethylsulfur pentafluoride: Difference between revisions
Christian75 (talk | contribs) Assessment (Stub/Low): +Chemicals (Rater) |
Eudialytos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Checked [[Chemspider]] and found a reference to [http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.119988.html Trifluoro(pentafluoro-λ6-sulfanyl)methane]. Can be used to expand article. [[User:Rwos|Rwos]] ([[User talk:Rwos|talk]]) 11:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC) |
Checked [[Chemspider]] and found a reference to [http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.119988.html Trifluoro(pentafluoro-λ6-sulfanyl)methane]. Can be used to expand article. [[User:Rwos|Rwos]] ([[User talk:Rwos|talk]]) 11:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
== NOT the most potent greenhouse gas == |
|||
SF<sub>6</sub> is "better" in this regard: 23500 x CO2. |
|||
Ref.: |
|||
Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Breón, F.-M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.-F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T., Robock, A., Stephens, G., Takemura, T., Zhang, H. Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. Chapter 8, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA [www.ghgprotocol.org, ], Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M., eds.; 2013: 659–640. |
|||
[[User:Eudialytos|Eudialytos]] ([[User talk:Eudialytos|talk]]) 22:25, 21 August 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:25, 21 August 2023
Chemicals Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Adding references
As per banner, I have added references to the stub, and refined the text. There may be several other issues with the article, but I assume that the request for additional references may be removed? Rwos (talk) 13:52, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Chemspider
Checked Chemspider and found a reference to Trifluoro(pentafluoro-λ6-sulfanyl)methane. Can be used to expand article. Rwos (talk) 11:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
NOT the most potent greenhouse gas
SF6 is "better" in this regard: 23500 x CO2. Ref.: Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Breón, F.-M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.-F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T., Robock, A., Stephens, G., Takemura, T., Zhang, H. Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. Chapter 8, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA [www.ghgprotocol.org, ], Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M., eds.; 2013: 659–640. Eudialytos (talk) 22:25, 21 August 2023 (UTC)