Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outside (Alaska): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
JKBrooks85 (talk | contribs) →Outside (Alaska): Reply |
JKBrooks85 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* '''Comment''': No comment on the article itself, but I strongly disagree with the notion that [[WP:BOLD]]ly redirecting is somehow not allowed. Both [[WP:BLAR]] and [[WP:ATD-R]] make it clear this ''is'' allowed, though it can of course be contested. [[User:Curbon7|Curbon7]] ([[User talk:Curbon7|talk]]) 20:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC) |
* '''Comment''': No comment on the article itself, but I strongly disagree with the notion that [[WP:BOLD]]ly redirecting is somehow not allowed. Both [[WP:BLAR]] and [[WP:ATD-R]] make it clear this ''is'' allowed, though it can of course be contested. [[User:Curbon7|Curbon7]] ([[User talk:Curbon7|talk]]) 20:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
* '''Comment''': This seems like clear dictionary (not encyclopedia) material to me. As such, deletion or soft redirect as an alternative are appropriate. [[User:Cnilep|Cnilep]] ([[User talk:Cnilep|talk]]) 08:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC) |
* '''Comment''': This seems like clear dictionary (not encyclopedia) material to me. As such, deletion or soft redirect as an alternative are appropriate. [[User:Cnilep|Cnilep]] ([[User talk:Cnilep|talk]]) 08:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
:[[User:JKBrooks85|JKBrooks85]] ([[User talk:JKBrooks85|talk]]) 20:59, 13 October 2023 (UTC) |
:[[User:JKBrooks85|JKBrooks85]] ([[User talk:JKBrooks85|talk]]) 20:59, 13 October 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:59, 13 October 2023
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Outside (Alaska) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I soft-redirected this to Wiktionary (wikt:Outside), but was reverted by Beeblebrox on the grounds that this shouldn't be done without discussion. I believe the article fails WP:NOTDICT, as it has no substance beyond a dictionary definition and I was unable to find sources that could be used as the basis for an encyclopedia article. Sojourner in the earth (talk) 19:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Alaska. Sojourner in the earth (talk) 19:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: No comment on the article itself, but I strongly disagree with the notion that WP:BOLDly redirecting is somehow not allowed. Both WP:BLAR and WP:ATD-R make it clear this is allowed, though it can of course be contested. Curbon7 (talk) 20:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: This seems like clear dictionary (not encyclopedia) material to me. As such, deletion or soft redirect as an alternative are appropriate. Cnilep (talk) 08:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- I'll do some additional research in historical records and other material to see if I can find additional references, but right now, I support a redirect.