Jump to content

User talk:Gary: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 54: Line 54:


The fields can remain empty until those technical reviews are undertaken, which will make it more clear which still need to be done. I'd need to run this through FAC talk to get buy-in from the wider community, but thought I'd see it it's technically viable before floating the idea more widely. Cheers - [[User:SchroCat|SchroCat]] ([[User talk:SchroCat|talk]]) 09:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
The fields can remain empty until those technical reviews are undertaken, which will make it more clear which still need to be done. I'd need to run this through FAC talk to get buy-in from the wider community, but thought I'd see it it's technically viable before floating the idea more widely. Cheers - [[User:SchroCat|SchroCat]] ([[User talk:SchroCat|talk]]) 09:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

: If someone wants to build this feature, then go for it, but I don't have the time to do so. Most importantly, whoever is performing these reviews must follow a standard convention, so that it's easy for the script to pick up on it. [[User:Gary|Gary]] ([[User talk:Gary#top|talk]]) 17:40, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:40, 24 November 2023

FAR Review

I have nominated The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. NegativeMP1 16:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Template:US-business-bio has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 7 § Template:US-business-bio until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:12, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for HDMI

HDMI has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 07:34, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Stanford Downey Architects Inc. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 10 § Stanford Downey Architects Inc. until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 02:32, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Graziani + Corazza has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 10 § Graziani + Corazza until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 02:32, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations viewer

Hi Gary, I don't think we've ever 'met' before, so hello! I have, however, seen your work in action with the nominations viewer. I've been mulling over its output and was wondering if a possible improvement is technically possible.

At the moment the output at FAC is as follows:

(nomination · 3 weeks old · Active today · 1 nominator · 6 participants · 2 supports)

Is there a way it can pick up and report when a source and image review has been passed or failed?

(nomination · 3 weeks old · Active today · 1 nominator · 6 participants · 2 supports · Pass source · Fail media)

The fields can remain empty until those technical reviews are undertaken, which will make it more clear which still need to be done. I'd need to run this through FAC talk to get buy-in from the wider community, but thought I'd see it it's technically viable before floating the idea more widely. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 09:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If someone wants to build this feature, then go for it, but I don't have the time to do so. Most importantly, whoever is performing these reviews must follow a standard convention, so that it's easy for the script to pick up on it. Gary (talk) 17:40, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]