User talk:RafaelJC12

Welcome!

Hello, RafaelJC12, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Romani people did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  Govindaharihari (talk) 02:53, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — SamX [talk · contribs] 21:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Please, tell me what "unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content" have I written. I can't know what you're talking about if you're this vague. Please tell me whether I have said anything that's untruthful. RafaelJC12 (talk) 21:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

@SamX RafaelJC12 (talk) 22:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sophie Labelle. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 21:40, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

How was my editing disruptive? RafaelJC12 (talk) 22:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – bradv 21:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RafaelJC12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The admins of Sophie Labelle's page are just censoring any mention of Labelle's fetish art. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/02/21/trans-cartoonist-diaper-fetish-art-kink-invited-speak-children/ https://www.heraldscotland.com/life_style/arts_ents/23342004.row-trans-nappy-cartoonist-asked-speak-library/#comments-anchor RafaelJC12 (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating the Biographies of Living Persons policy, but you seem to think that your comments(that even I as an admin cannot see) were proper, so there are no grounds to remove the block. 331dot (talk) 23:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

@331dot I believe that my editing, which you can check here, was proper. Furthermore, it is impossible for me to conclude that any of my editing was improper if the admins will not give any argument for why it should be. The only reason my edits are reverted is because the admins want to censor any mention of the subjects' fetish material. RafaelJC12 (talk) 00:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

RafaelJC12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've been blocked after making this edit on Sophie Labelle page, which was censored by the admins without proper justification. In fact, the admins of Sophie Labelle's page have repeatedly censored any mentioned of Labelle's fetish material, such as this one. RafaelJC12 (talk) 22:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I've been blocked after making [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sophie%20Labelle&diff=prev&oldid=1186534339 this edit] on Sophie Labelle page, which was censored by the admins without proper justification. In fact, the admins of Sophie Labelle's page have repeatedly censored any mentioned of Labelle's fetish material, such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sophie%20Labelle&diff=prev&oldid=1140934082 this one]. [[User:RafaelJC12|RafaelJC12]] ([[User talk:RafaelJC12#top|talk]]) 22:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I've been blocked after making [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sophie%20Labelle&diff=prev&oldid=1186534339 this edit] on Sophie Labelle page, which was censored by the admins without proper justification. In fact, the admins of Sophie Labelle's page have repeatedly censored any mentioned of Labelle's fetish material, such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sophie%20Labelle&diff=prev&oldid=1140934082 this one]. [[User:RafaelJC12|RafaelJC12]] ([[User talk:RafaelJC12#top|talk]]) 22:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I've been blocked after making [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sophie%20Labelle&diff=prev&oldid=1186534339 this edit] on Sophie Labelle page, which was censored by the admins without proper justification. In fact, the admins of Sophie Labelle's page have repeatedly censored any mentioned of Labelle's fetish material, such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sophie%20Labelle&diff=prev&oldid=1140934082 this one]. [[User:RafaelJC12|RafaelJC12]] ([[User talk:RafaelJC12#top|talk]]) 22:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}