Talk:Highest military ranks: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:27, 13 December 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Highest military ranks article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Military history: Culture Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force

Wonsu

Isn't it dubious to mention North Korea's version of Wonsu when they have the superior rank of Taewonsu (also included in the article)? Since this is about highest military ranks, I think the NK Wonsu should be removed. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 08:13, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is going on with Generalissimus of the Soviet Union?

This article talks about if the Generalissimus of the Soviet Union was an adopted rank, it wasn't. I understand if it should be kept as a proposed rank but right now it is flat out plain wrong. 172.116.113.102 (talk) 06:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Isn't it dubious to mention North Korea's version of [[Wonsu]] when they have the superior rank of [[Taewonsu]] (also included in the article)? Since this is about ''highest'' military ranks, I think the NK Wonsu should be removed. '''[[User:Sturmgewehr88|<span style="background:black"><span style="color:red">ミーラー強斗武</span>]]'''</span> ([[User_talk:Sturmgewehr88|StG88ぬ会話]]) 08:13, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
+== What is going on with Generalissimus of the Soviet Union? ==
+This article talks about if the Generalissimus of the Soviet Union was an adopted rank, '''it wasn't.''' I understand if it should be kept as a proposed rank but right now it is flat out plain wrong. [[Special:Contributions/172.116.113.102|172.116.113.102]] ([[User talk:172.116.113.102|talk]]) 06:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)