Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany Ford: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
+
Line 10: Line 10:
*'''Delete''' per nom - unelected candidate, and don't quite think this is there on GNG grounds. [[User:SportingFlyer|SportingFlyer]] ''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:top;">[[User talk:SportingFlyer|T]]</span>''·''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:bottom;">[[Special:Contributions/SportingFlyer|C]]</span>'' 02:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom - unelected candidate, and don't quite think this is there on GNG grounds. [[User:SportingFlyer|SportingFlyer]] ''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:top;">[[User talk:SportingFlyer|T]]</span>''·''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:bottom;">[[Special:Contributions/SportingFlyer|C]]</span>'' 02:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' I checked the newspaper archives and wasn't able to find any interviews or significant coverage. '''[[User:Dr_vulpes|<span style="background:#4B0082; color:white;">Dr vulpes</span>]]''' [[User talk:Dr_vulpes|(Talk)]] 18:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' I checked the newspaper archives and wasn't able to find any interviews or significant coverage. '''[[User:Dr_vulpes|<span style="background:#4B0082; color:white;">Dr vulpes</span>]]''' [[User talk:Dr_vulpes|(Talk)]] 18:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete''' per G5 - created by sock of [[ w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anne Barrington|Anne Barrington]]. Confirmed (by me) on Commons. [[User:elcobbola|<span style="color:#038"><i>'''Эlcobbola'''</i></span>]]&nbsp;<sub>[[User talk:elcobbola|talk]]</sub> 15:59, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:59, 1 January 2024

Tiffany Ford

Tiffany Ford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorialized WP:BLP of a person not properly sourced as having a strong claim to passing Wikipedia inclusion criteria.
The principal notability claim here is that she's been a school board trustee and non-winning candidate for election to city council, which are not WP:NPOL-passing roles. Having a bit of run of the mill campaign coverage in the context of a non-winning election campaign doesn't add up to passing WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass NPOL, either: every candidate in every election can always show some evidence of campaign coverage, so having campaign coverage doesn't make her more special than other candidates.
Otherwise, what's left is a couple of local-interest awards in local-interest contexts that don't fulfill WP:ANYBIO, and a bunch of primary sourcing that isn't support for notability at all.
Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when she achieves a stronger notability claim, but nothing here is already enough as of right now. Bearcat (talk) 16:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]