Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Decrease

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection
Click here to return to Requests for page protection. Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection

Upsilon

• Upsilon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: I think the protection of the page is not needed because the last block was imposed in 2010, which is 14 years ago, a long time to be lifted. Also, upsilon has its limited use in most fields, perhaps opening access for anonymous users to contribute seems fair and suitable as now. In addition, the blocking administrator seems inactive by my view of their user page.2001:EE0:4BC4:FA0:DC97:2FF6:583C:A2A0 (talk) 15:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Comment The blocking administrator, User:Future Perfect at Sunrise, was active within the last few days; they should be allowed to weigh in first. You're welcome to make an edit request in the meantime. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. I will contact him. You are welcome to delete my request. 2001:EE0:4BC5:74D0:ECDE:4F49:EAC2:92CB (talk) 01:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

But I was unable to add a request in his talk page. 2001:EE0:4BC5:74D0:ECDE:4F49:EAC2:92CB (talk) 01:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Courtesy ping @Future Perfect at Sunrise: See above. Zinnober9 (talk) 01:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

They have instructions for how to contact them if you can't post to their talk page, at the top of their talk page. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 01:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

@Dennis Brown, @Future Perfect at Sunrise, @Ohnoitsjamie and @Zinnober9, chi needs to be open too. 2001:EE0:4BC6:8990:ECDE:4F49:EAC2:92CB (talk) 11:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Stockton Rush

The protection is no longer necessary on the Stockton Rush article because it is not to any notoriety. The page is not edited on a regularly and the subject of the matter is no longer reported about.