Talk:Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Updates 2023: new section |
→Gobldegook and jargon: Reply |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Really terrible article full of PR lingo and pseudo-intelligent nonsense. I cleaned it up but can't be bothered wading through it all properly. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:OddsBodkins|OddsBodkins]] ([[User talk:OddsBodkins#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OddsBodkins|contribs]]) 09:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Really terrible article full of PR lingo and pseudo-intelligent nonsense. I cleaned it up but can't be bothered wading through it all properly. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:OddsBodkins|OddsBodkins]] ([[User talk:OddsBodkins#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OddsBodkins|contribs]]) 09:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:I got rid of the whole middle section. This was left some years ago, much before my time. However, I find this comment quite shocking! I am quite appalled that Wikipedia editors themselves have very little dedication to accuracy if they <nowiki>''</nowiki>can't be bothered wading through<nowiki>''</nowiki> content on the site. [[User:Erinstewart-REEEP|Erinstewart-REEEP]] ([[User talk:Erinstewart-REEEP|talk]]) 13:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Updates 2023 == |
== Updates 2023 == |
Revision as of 13:43, 11 March 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merger proposal
Propose to merge articles on Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership and REEEP as same thing. Beagel 16:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- Done. This has evidently been done. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 08:16, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Gobldegook and jargon
Really terrible article full of PR lingo and pseudo-intelligent nonsense. I cleaned it up but can't be bothered wading through it all properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OddsBodkins (talk • contribs) 09:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- I got rid of the whole middle section. This was left some years ago, much before my time. However, I find this comment quite shocking! I am quite appalled that Wikipedia editors themselves have very little dedication to accuracy if they ''can't be bothered wading through'' content on the site. Erinstewart-REEEP (talk) 13:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Updates 2023
Full disclosure - I am the Communications Manager. I want to update the page and remove the outdated jargon and information and update the logo. Erinstewart-REEEP (talk) 13:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC)