Talk:Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Gobldegook and jargon: Reply |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:I got rid of the whole middle section. This was left some years ago, much before my time. However, I find this comment quite shocking! I am quite appalled that Wikipedia editors themselves have very little dedication to accuracy if they <nowiki>''</nowiki>can't be bothered wading through<nowiki>''</nowiki> content on the site. [[User:Erinstewart-REEEP|Erinstewart-REEEP]] ([[User talk:Erinstewart-REEEP|talk]]) 13:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC) |
:I got rid of the whole middle section. This was left some years ago, much before my time. However, I find this comment quite shocking! I am quite appalled that Wikipedia editors themselves have very little dedication to accuracy if they <nowiki>''</nowiki>can't be bothered wading through<nowiki>''</nowiki> content on the site. [[User:Erinstewart-REEEP|Erinstewart-REEEP]] ([[User talk:Erinstewart-REEEP|talk]]) 13:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Updates |
== Updates 2024 == |
||
Full disclosure - I am the Communications Manager. I want to update the page and remove the outdated jargon and information and update the logo. [[User:Erinstewart-REEEP|Erinstewart-REEEP]] ([[User talk:Erinstewart-REEEP|talk]]) 13:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC) |
Full disclosure - I am the Communications Manager. I want to update the page and remove the outdated jargon and information and update the logo. [[User:Erinstewart-REEEP|Erinstewart-REEEP]] ([[User talk:Erinstewart-REEEP|talk]]) 13:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:48, 11 March 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merger proposal
Propose to merge articles on Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership and REEEP as same thing. Beagel 16:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- Done. This has evidently been done. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 08:16, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Gobldegook and jargon
Really terrible article full of PR lingo and pseudo-intelligent nonsense. I cleaned it up but can't be bothered wading through it all properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OddsBodkins (talk • contribs) 09:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- I got rid of the whole middle section. This was left some years ago, much before my time. However, I find this comment quite shocking! I am quite appalled that Wikipedia editors themselves have very little dedication to accuracy if they ''can't be bothered wading through'' content on the site. Erinstewart-REEEP (talk) 13:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Updates 2024
Full disclosure - I am the Communications Manager. I want to update the page and remove the outdated jargon and information and update the logo. Erinstewart-REEEP (talk) 13:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC)