Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Jin (entrepreneur): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
SafariScribe (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
Jeraxmoira (talk | contribs) →Justin Jin (entrepreneur): Reply |
||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
}} <span style="border-radius:8em;padding:0 7px;background:darkgreen">[[User:I'm tla|<span style="color:white">'''TLA'''</span>]]</span><sup>[[User talk:I'm tla |<span style="color: grey">tlak</span>]]</sup> 16:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC) |
}} <span style="border-radius:8em;padding:0 7px;background:darkgreen">[[User:I'm tla|<span style="color:white">'''TLA'''</span>]]</span><sup>[[User talk:I'm tla |<span style="color: grey">tlak</span>]]</sup> 16:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
:[[WP:PRIMARY]]: Sources 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8 are interviews. Interviews are not independent and do not count towards GNG. [[User:Jeraxmoira|Jeraxmoira🐉]] ([[User talk:Jeraxmoira|talk]]) 19:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:37, 13 March 2024
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Justin Jin (entrepreneur) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find any reasonable purpose for a standalone article. I noticed this could be vandalism since the parenthesis isn't movable except by an admin. Well, I can't find sources which didn't provide me enough reasons to be inclusive. Fails WP: GNG. The founding company doesn't seem to be notable or reach any WP: ORG and some of not all seems to base on the company and not the subject (there could be mentions) but still Notability is not inherited. While I believe Notability is not permanent, The young subject can be notable in the future All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 07:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Business. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 07:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: hello, I'm the person who accepted this out of AfC. i agree with you that the company is not quite meeting notability, which is why i rejected it, as the sources are clearly predominately about the founder. the sources in question, though, include Billboard, The Source, El Caribe, and Independent Nigeria, all of which profile Justin Jin quite in-depth and are generally reliable. She was afairy 07:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I also found this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Jin. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 09:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- You should have found that before nom'ing this, as the article is a
G5G4 candidate. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- You should have found that before nom'ing this, as the article is a
- Comment: Fails WP: ANYBIO, WP: CREATIVE and WP: BASIC#1 since it clearly states, If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability where the articles if not all talks about the teenager and a non notable company he founded. I am also sensing WP: UPE since this page from the previous AFD discussion and salting when i wanted to move to Justin Jin (removing the parenthesis). I have tried to take info from all the sources, but they kept talking the same thing about the subjects media industry. I meant there is no context or importance of meeting notability. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 10:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Internet, and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete:
G5G4 of Justin Jin - UtherSRG (talk) 12:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)- it doesn't quite make sense where your G5 vote is coming from, UtherSRG: if the article's author isn't blocked, and in any case, i believe i've already applied some relatively substantial edits. She was afairy 12:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Whoops! I should have said G4. I've amended. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- i'm not sure that works here. the above discussion took place one year ago, and according to the source assessment table, 0 of them are repeated? She was afairy 13:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- G4 is about content, not sources. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- it
applies to sufficiently identical copies
, and according to the wayback machine, there are very significant differences, completely failing G4. She was afairy 13:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)sufficiently identical
is vague. The content is essentially the same. There is no new information in the new article, there are no new assertions of notability. For me, that is sufficiently identical. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- it
- G4 is about content, not sources. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- i'm not sure that works here. the above discussion took place one year ago, and according to the source assessment table, 0 of them are repeated? She was afairy 13:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Whoops! I should have said G4. I've amended. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- it doesn't quite make sense where your G5 vote is coming from, UtherSRG: if the article's author isn't blocked, and in any case, i believe i've already applied some relatively substantial edits. She was afairy 12:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – The nominator's peculiar passion to delete this page and the imprecise G4 rationale by an administrator (having been deleted over a year ago, with strong changes and a massive increase in sourcing, and no hoaxes) seem to reflect a common trend I've seen on Wikipedia. Young, relatively notable subjects such as Rishab Jain, Avi Schiffmann, Jenk Oz, Kevin Leyes (which has since been recreated under Leyes (singer) due to new sourcing, which is evidently the case here as well, are often a target of editors. For instance, comments by editors like "I don't see what is special about this kid" is borderline derogatory. (I'm excluding sports people by the way, who have relatively lower requirements for notability). I came across this person when creating a draft of a different person of the same name, which firsthand pulled up a USA Today Contributor piece, which does not establish notability, and hence why I disregarded it. The sourcing presented here is strong (
sixfour generally reliable sources), though I'm not going to place my vote just yet.
TLAtlak 16:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- WP:PRIMARY: Sources 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8 are interviews. Interviews are not independent and do not count towards GNG. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)