User talk:DatGuy: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:DatGuy/Archives/2024/February. (BOT) |
Tim Pierce (talk | contribs) →Exclusion for composite image?: new section |
||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
:@[[User:Trianglewelder|Trianglewelder]] there is a little email issue so please follow the IRC method at [[WP:REVDELREQUEST]] instead. [[User:DatGuy|DatGuy]]<sup>[[User talk:DatGuy|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/DatGuy|Contribs]]</sub> 20:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
:@[[User:Trianglewelder|Trianglewelder]] there is a little email issue so please follow the IRC method at [[WP:REVDELREQUEST]] instead. [[User:DatGuy|DatGuy]]<sup>[[User talk:DatGuy|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/DatGuy|Contribs]]</sub> 20:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Exclusion for composite image? == |
|||
I recently uploaded [[:File:Three Little Pigs - Fuller Brush Man 1933 and 1948.png]] with two frames from different releases of [[The Three Little Pigs (film)]]. Since it is a composite image, I scaled it to keep each frame within the non-free content guidelines of 320x240. But the final image file is more than 512px and more than 0.1 megapixels, so DatBot of course keeps resizing it. |
|||
I understand that I could upload each frame as a separate image, but I think that to ensure the proper context it's important for them to be seen together. Is there a mechanism to exclude an image from DatBot resizing, and if so, can you point me to how I would apply for one? |
|||
Thank you for all the work you do! [[User:Tim Pierce|—Tim Pierce]] ([[User talk:Tim Pierce|talk]]) 21:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:10, 26 March 2024
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. v/r - at any time by removing the Seawolf35 T--C 00:02, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).
|
|
- Phase I of the 2024 RfA review is now open for participation. Editors are invited to review, comment on, and propose improvements to the requests for adminship process.
- Following an RfC, the inactivity requirement for the removal of the interface administrator right increased from 6 months to 12 months.
- The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)
- The 2024 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ*ぜ, AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Doǵu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, MdsShakil, Minorax, Nehaoua, Renvoy and RoySmith as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
- Following the 2024 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Ajraddatz, Albertoleoncio, EPIC, JJMC89, Johannnes89, Melos and Yahya.
==
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
==
- )
Trianglewelder (talk) 01:19, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Trianglewelder there is a little email issue so please follow the IRC method at WP:REVDELREQUEST instead. DatGuyTalkContribs 20:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Exclusion for composite image?
I recently uploaded File:Three Little Pigs - Fuller Brush Man 1933 and 1948.png with two frames from different releases of The Three Little Pigs (film). Since it is a composite image, I scaled it to keep each frame within the non-free content guidelines of 320x240. But the final image file is more than 512px and more than 0.1 megapixels, so DatBot of course keeps resizing it.
I understand that I could upload each frame as a separate image, but I think that to ensure the proper context it's important for them to be seen together. Is there a mechanism to exclude an image from DatBot resizing, and if so, can you point me to how I would apply for one?
Thank you for all the work you do! —Tim Pierce (talk) 21:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)