Jump to content

Talk:Academic discipline: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Evaluation: new section
Line 34: Line 34:


[[User:2020tabracey|2020tabracey]] ([[User talk:2020tabracey|talk]]) 03:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
[[User:2020tabracey|2020tabracey]] ([[User talk:2020tabracey|talk]]) 03:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC)



Hello,
The section discussing bibliometrics and citation flow is not explained clearly. A more detailed explanation or example of how bibliometrics can be used to track the influence and flow of ideas would enhance understanding.

Revision as of 19:21, 7 April 2024

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): P.f.n96.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC) Hello, I am currently asking a pretty simple question about the article, it is mentioned that this subdivision of academic discipline focuses mostly on college and higher education students, is there a reason why high school students and below are not included within the topic of academic discipline? Thank you!Arrriaanna (talk) 01:55, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Arianna[reply]

Math

What is the multiplication 49.148.134.93 (talk) 05:04, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Physics

2024 board exam

questions 106.216.255.97 (talk) 06:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article seems neutral with no biasOrangetulip12 (talk) 05:02, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Evaluation

Hi everyone,

I've been reading through the article about Academic Discipline, and I wanted to share some thoughts. I noticed that while most of the content is relevant to the main topic, there are a few parts that seem a bit off-topic or confusing. For example, the section about the history of the concept is interesting, but it doesn't seem directly related to the main idea of academic disciplines. It might be helpful to either clarify how it connects or consider if it's necessary to include.

Overall, though, I found the article easy to understand and informative. It would be great to see some updates on when the information was last reviewed or updated to ensure it stays accurate.

question from lecture: Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?"

I checked out the article about Academic Discipline, and from what I can tell, it seems pretty fair. I didn't notice anything that seemed to favor one side over another. Everything seemed to be presented in a balanced way. So, yeah, it looks neutral to me!

2020tabracey (talk) 03:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, The section discussing bibliometrics and citation flow is not explained clearly. A more detailed explanation or example of how bibliometrics can be used to track the influence and flow of ideas would enhance understanding.