Talk:1947 Gilgit rebellion: Difference between revisions
→Infobox: Reply |
→Infobox: Reply |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:::* https://www.google.com.pk/books/edition/Gilgit_Rebelion/53BtBQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover |
:::* https://www.google.com.pk/books/edition/Gilgit_Rebelion/53BtBQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover |
||
:::[[User:Rahim231|Rahim231]] ([[User talk:Rahim231|talk]]) 17:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |
:::[[User:Rahim231|Rahim231]] ([[User talk:Rahim231|talk]]) 17:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::I agree, it certainly is not a military conflict. There is not enough material to prove so. [[User:LiterallyKira|LiterallyKira]] ([[User talk:LiterallyKira|talk]]) 17:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:29, 8 April 2024
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Welcome to talk page
Help by improving the article Rehmanbutt231 (talk) 12:11, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Infobox "Result"
Please note that Template:Infobox military conflict#Parameters states against "result" that "this parameter may use one of two standard terms: "X victory" or "Inconclusive"." The infobox has been amended to reflect this. Please read the template "result" guidance in full before amending or reverting. It would probably be best to discuss any proposed change here first to seek consensus. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Infobox
@Kautilya3 Hi, I have seen your edit recently on this page and appreciate that you rewrote the lead. For the infobox shouldn't it remain ? given that this is a military operation/rebellion like any other operation/rebellion.
Rahim231 (talk) 16:17, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have no idea what it was, but it was certainly not a military conflict, which was the infobox you have used. Moreover, there isn't enough material here to warrant separate articles for the political aspects and military aspects. I think somebody expanded an original redirect and changed the title to a military conflict. The "Operation Datta Khel" is nothing more than a footnote to the whole episode. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Operation datta khel was the codename for the military operation and rebellion against the governer and takeover of the gilgit region. A rebellion is a Military conflict, if not so i dont know what to call it. Operation Datta Khel was clearly and explicitly stated in the book By the officer who directed it called it a military operation for the rebellion against the governer and the state of jammu and kashmir :-
- Rahim231 (talk) 17:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- I agree, it certainly is not a military conflict. There is not enough material to prove so. LiterallyKira (talk) 17:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have no idea what it was, but it was certainly not a military conflict, which was the infobox you have used. Moreover, there isn't enough material here to warrant separate articles for the political aspects and military aspects. I think somebody expanded an original redirect and changed the title to a military conflict. The "Operation Datta Khel" is nothing more than a footnote to the whole episode. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class national militaries articles
- National militaries task force articles
- C-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- C-Class Chinese military history articles
- Chinese military history task force articles
- C-Class South Asian military history articles
- South Asian military history task force articles