Talk:Liberalism in South Korea: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 12:25, 18 April 2024

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article should be moved to Liberalism in South Korea unless someone is willing to add North Korean stuffs. --Nanshu 07:53, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

See remarks on North Korea added in this article. --Gangulf 19:12, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

"North Korea is a communist dictatorship that doesn't allow liberal parties to exist." It this all we know about North Korea? Then this article should be moved to Liberalism in South Korea. --Nanshu 00:57, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Specifics[edit]

The article appears to fail to go into the specifics of what liberalism means in Korea, beyond ethnic nationalism. IRWolfie- (talk) 18:50, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

North Korea[edit]

is the Korean Social Democratic Party related in some way Braganza (talk) 18:42, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creative Korea Party[edit]

@Mureungdowon: why are they not part of the democratic family while both People Party are? Braganza (talk) 14:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pine Tree Party[edit]

I think Pine tree party is not liberal party. First there is no program for liberalism in the party program. And secondly Byun Hee-jae who is taking quite many parts in the tparty called himself as conservative not liberal. What do you think? Shinseongmin1917 (talk) 12:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 12:22, 18 April 2024 edit Shinseongmin1917 (talk \| contribs) 85 edits →‎Pine Tree Party: new section Tag: New topic ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 12:25, 18 April 2024 edit undo Shinseongmin1917 (talk \| contribs) 85 edits →‎Pine Tree Party
Line 22:		Line 22:
	== Pine Tree Party ==		== Pine Tree Party ==

	I think [[Pine Tree Party\|Pine tree party]] is not liberal party. First there is no program for liberalism in the party program. And secondly [[Byun Hee-jae]] who is taking quite many parts in the tparty called himself as conservative not liberal. What do you think? ~~@Braganza~~ [[User:Shinseongmin1917\|Shinseongmin1917]] ([[User talk:Shinseongmin1917\|talk]]) 12:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)		I think [[Pine Tree Party\|Pine tree party]] is not liberal party. First there is no program for liberalism in the party program. And secondly [[Byun Hee-jae]] who is taking quite many parts in the tparty called himself as conservative not liberal. What do you think? [[User:Shinseongmin1917\|Shinseongmin1917]] ([[User talk:Shinseongmin1917\|talk]]) 12:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)