Jump to content

Talk:Purdue University Global: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
JA1776 (talk | contribs)
Creating new threat on recent revisions
Line 13: Line 13:
}}
}}
{{Archive box|auto=yes}}
{{Archive box|auto=yes}}

== Explaining Reversions ==
1. Purdue Global is part of the Purdue University system.<ref>https://www.purdue.edu/home/about/systemwide-campuses/</ref> All Purdue campuses have their own accreditation. Purdue Global is not unique in that fact as a recent edit suggests.
2. An important part of understanding what Purdue Global is, is knowing that it targets working adults. This was removed without justification.
3. This particular editor has, for years, been attempting to include the claim that 12.5% (this time 13%) of revenue belongs in the lede. Dispute resolution has been attempted.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purdue_University_Globalhttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Purdue_University_Global&oldid=1181995576#RfC:_What_is_the_best_way_to_describe_how_Purdue_University_Global's_largest_contractor,_Graham_Holdings_Company,_is_paid?</ref> Requests for Comments have reached a consensus that it does not belong in the lede for various reasons.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purdue_University_Globalhttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Purdue_University_Global&oldid=1181995576#RfC:_What_is_the_best_way_to_describe_how_Purdue_University_Global's_largest_contractor,_Graham_Holdings_Company,_is_paid?</ref>

Revision as of 22:56, 19 April 2024

Explaining Reversions

1. Purdue Global is part of the Purdue University system.[1] All Purdue campuses have their own accreditation. Purdue Global is not unique in that fact as a recent edit suggests. 2. An important part of understanding what Purdue Global is, is knowing that it targets working adults. This was removed without justification. 3. This particular editor has, for years, been attempting to include the claim that 12.5% (this time 13%) of revenue belongs in the lede. Dispute resolution has been attempted.[2] Requests for Comments have reached a consensus that it does not belong in the lede for various reasons.[3]