Talk:Adolphe Schloss: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Change of title: Reply |
→Change of title: Reply |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:It would be better if there be two articles one about person and one about the collection if the collection topic is extensive enough to have its own article. [[User:Wiki is tricky|Wiki is tricky]] ([[User talk:Wiki is tricky|talk]]) 11:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
:It would be better if there be two articles one about person and one about the collection if the collection topic is extensive enough to have its own article. [[User:Wiki is tricky|Wiki is tricky]] ([[User talk:Wiki is tricky|talk]]) 11:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
::My feeling is that there is plenty that can be said about the collection. I'm less sure that there is sufficient material for an article about Adolphe Schloss himself. [[User:Rjm at sleepers|Rjm at sleepers]] ([[User talk:Rjm at sleepers|talk]]) 05:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 05:15, 10 May 2024
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Change of title[edit]
My suggestion is that we change the title to The Schloss Collection and have an introductory paragraph on Adolphe Schloss himself.
Rjm at sleepers (talk) 09:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- It would be better if there be two articles one about person and one about the collection if the collection topic is extensive enough to have its own article. Wiki is tricky (talk) 11:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- My feeling is that there is plenty that can be said about the collection. I'm less sure that there is sufficient material for an article about Adolphe Schloss himself. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 05:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)