Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Forest: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:06, 29 May 2024

Ed Forest

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. I'm not seeing refs to consider but perhaps they exist in languages I can't read. JMWt (talk) 09:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Norway and Sweden. JMWt (talk) 09:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Geography. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 14:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I think this is just an old mis-translation. Eidskog (described in this article as a town near there) translates roughly as "Ed Forest". Google just returns people of this name, and ChatGPT refers to the "Eidskog forest" in the area instead. Walsh90210 (talk) 00:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I found what seems like a relevant reference: an article in Svensk geografisk årsbok from 1951 [1] (not available digitally). I found a web page that discusses thar article, which confirms that it's the right forest [2]. Andejons (talk) 10:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I can't get that to load but I'm going to assume good faith. As you can see it, would you think it meets the criteria of substantial coverage in a RS? JMWt (talk) 10:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to have a 15-page article devoted to it published in a scholarly annual. I'm not sure if that is usually seen as enough for notability. Andejons (talk) 12:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Right. I don't usually consider references that nobody has read, but that does sound quite long JMWt (talk) 12:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. 104.7.152.180 (talk) 14:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 *:It seems to have a 15-page article devoted to it published in a scholarly annual. I'm not sure if that is usually seen as enough for notability. [[User:Andejons|Andejons]] ([[User talk:Andejons|talk]]) 12:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 *::Right. I don't usually consider references that nobody has read, but that does sound quite long [[User:JMWt|JMWt]] ([[User talk:JMWt|talk]]) 12:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
+:'''Delete '''per nom. [[Special:Contributions/104.7.152.180|104.7.152.180]] ([[User talk:104.7.152.180|talk]]) 14:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)