Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 May 29: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 21: Line 21:
* {{Tfd links|Editnotices/Page/Ballon d'Or}}
* {{Tfd links|Editnotices/Page/Ballon d'Or}}
This editnotice is outdated and arguably unnecessary, since the page is now protected, therefore IPs can't mess things up anymore. I requested for an [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Editnotices/Page/Ballon_d%27Or&oldid=1222269613 update], but no one seemed interested in it. I think it could be deleted, since in its current state it has no valuable use. [[User:Mazewaxie|<strong><span style="color: #606060;">Mazewaxie</span></strong>]] ([[User talk:Mazewaxie|<span style=" color: #606060;">talk</span>]] • [[Special:CentralAuth/Mazewaxie|<span style="color: #606060;">contribs</span>]]) 19:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
This editnotice is outdated and arguably unnecessary, since the page is now protected, therefore IPs can't mess things up anymore. I requested for an [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Editnotices/Page/Ballon_d%27Or&oldid=1222269613 update], but no one seemed interested in it. I think it could be deleted, since in its current state it has no valuable use. [[User:Mazewaxie|<strong><span style="color: #606060;">Mazewaxie</span></strong>]] ([[User talk:Mazewaxie|<span style=" color: #606060;">talk</span>]] • [[Special:CentralAuth/Mazewaxie|<span style="color: #606060;">contribs</span>]]) 19:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
* '''Comment''' You don't seem to have tried discussing it at [[Talk:Ballon d'Or]], which would probably have been the best place to have interested editors see your comments. Nor have you notified that talk page about this deletion nomination. [[User:Anomie|Anomie]][[User talk:Anomie|⚔]] 21:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)


==== [[Template:Captain Everything!]] ====
==== [[Template:Captain Everything!]] ====

Revision as of 21:31, 29 May 2024

I've nominated deletion you created Template:Flexbox, which is template aren't comprehensible and are unnecessary. The title is not suitable Template:Flexbox. The Template:Flexbox has been soonly deleted by administrator/moderator. 2806:2F0:33E1:E0CB:3D03:EF97:2202:77 (talk) 20:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep: Nominator's rationale is incomprehensible. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This editnotice is outdated and arguably unnecessary, since the page is now protected, therefore IPs can't mess things up anymore. I requested for an update, but no one seemed interested in it. I think it could be deleted, since in its current state it has no valuable use. Mazewaxie (talkcontribs) 19:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment You don't seem to have tried discussing it at Talk:Ballon d'Or, which would probably have been the best place to have interested editors see your comments. Nor have you notified that talk page about this deletion nomination. Anomie 21:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All articles for the albums have been redirected to the artist's page, making this navbox irrelevant. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar. Gonnym (talk) 08:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then you can add it to other articles. Your nominations of late are nominating good useful templates without thinking they should be added to articles before going to Tfd. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't add templates to articles just because someone created a template with a link to it. If I feel it has no merit I send it here. If you want me to amend my nomination I will. Gonnym (talk) 16:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 12:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amending nomination: A navigation template that was created 11 years ago and until now was unused and now is used on a single article. Navigation templates aren't helpful if they aren't used on the entire set. This seems like this template is apparently unwanted as it would have been used by now. Gonnym (talk) 16:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused style template. Gonnym (talk) 09:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline template. Gonnym (talk) 09:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline template. Gonnym (talk) 09:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and seemingly broken timeline template. Gonnym (talk) 09:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yah, I forgot to delete that. My Mistake. PensRule11385 (talk) 21:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused OpenStreetMap template. Gonnym (talk) 09:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unlinked from anywhere. Gonnym (talk) 09:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A year later and this doesn't seem to have been used or linked to from anywhere. Gonnym (talk) 09:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and probably unneeded as {{Lang-be}} can be used for this. Gonnym (talk) 09:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused route template. Gonnym (talk) 08:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination Sanibel sun (talk) 13:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused route template. Gonnym (talk) 08:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basic documentation templates which I've replaced with {{Script/basic documentation}}. Gonnym (talk) 08:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Arusha Rural District with Template:Arusha District.
{{Arusha Rural District}} is fuller. Template:Arusha District should be turned into a disambiguation because {{Arusha Urban District}} exists as well. Aldij (talk) 14:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Template:Arusha District shouldn't be turned into a disambiguation page and the Rural District main link links to the same article as the main district template. And on top of that, we have Template:Districts of Arusha which features all the same links on the main Arusha navbox, Template:Arusha. This may be a case of merging everything to one template, having sections for all these links, and deleting the rest of the navboxes. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 00:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Dag with Template:Dagger.
I'm going slightly more "discussion" with this TFD than anything, primarily thinking that {{dag}} should either be merged into {{dagger}} or renamed to make it more obvious as to why it's being used (though expanding the name might then make it longer than just typing out the <sup>...</sup> pair...). As it stands, {{dag}} by itself is potentially confusing (e.g. "what is a dag", or why it gives a superscript output) so I feel like something needs to be done. Primefac (talk) 14:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I find it strange that we still use archaic print notations instead of hyperlinked notes. How are either of those better than a regular {{efn}} note? Gonnym (talk) 15:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: The preferred option is to redirect {{dag}} to {{dagger}}. Given its minimal use, merging simplifies matters. However, if retaining the functionality is crucial, renaming {{dag}} to "superscript-dagger" or "dagger-sup" would clarify its purpose, albeit making it longer. Anoop Bhatia (talk) 02:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can tell, it's basically only used as part of {{TAAR ligands}}. Do we need a template for this at all? Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 08:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: If choose to merge and retain functionality
{{#if: {{{s|}}} | <sup>†</sup> | † }}

{{dag}} will output †
{{dag|s}} will output <sup>†</sup>
Anoop Bhatia (talk) 13:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 00:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]