User talk:DocZach

May 2024

You have recently made edits related to abortion. This is a standard message to inform you that abortion is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 03:42, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Andrew Tate, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Criminal investigations are active; we will not report this as fact at this point in the case. The fact that you restored this after BLP was already cited is most concerning. VQuakr (talk) 14:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

He admitted himself that he was a pimp. That is not defamatory language, and it is not a criminal accusation. Calling him a sex-trafficker would indeed be defamatory and not appropriate as he has not been convicted of it, but calling him a pimp is accurate terminology because he has admitted to and has been documented by reliable sources to have earned money and setup women to make money on NSFW webcams. DocZach (talk) 20:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Andrew Tate

Your recent editing history at Andrew Tate shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 18:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)