Talk:Coda Media: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Superb Owl (talk | contribs) upgrading 'class' from 'start' to 'C' |
→COI Tag: Reply |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
@[[User:Dr.Swag_Lord,_Ph.d,|Dr.Swag_Lord,_Ph.d,]], which editor(s) are you flagging for COI? [[User:Superb Owl|Superb Owl]] ([[User talk:Superb Owl|talk]]) 03:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
@[[User:Dr.Swag_Lord,_Ph.d,|Dr.Swag_Lord,_Ph.d,]], which editor(s) are you flagging for COI? [[User:Superb Owl|Superb Owl]] ([[User talk:Superb Owl|talk]]) 03:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
:@[[User:Superb Owl|Superb Owl]] That would be {{noping|Kikirikipiopiopio}}z [[User:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d|Dr. Swag Lord]] ([[User talk:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d|talk]]) 03:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:44, 11 June 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Coda Media article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Minor edit. I changed a reference to "gays" to "gay people." Gay is an adjective which is not subject to pluralization.David Cary Hart (talk) 17:53, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard has an RFC regarding the reliability of Coda Story
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard has an RFC for possible consensus regarding the reliability of Coda Story. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 20:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
COI Tag
@Dr.Swag_Lord,_Ph.d,, which editor(s) are you flagging for COI? Superb Owl (talk) 03:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Superb Owl That would be Kikirikipiopiopioz Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 03:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC)