User talk:PiginToWorld: Difference between revisions

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KeyQaad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PiginToWorld! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Previous account?

Hi, and welcome! Can I ask you, have you previously edited under another account? Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I just followed the process on YBNL Nation. Did I do anything wrong? PinginToWorld (talk) 09:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not saying you did anything wrong. It's just that I noticed among your first 20 edits you created not only a new draft, but also a category and a template. It probably took me 2,000 edits to even know what a template is! (But then, I am a slow learner...) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did, I thought that added those things that was also in YBNL Nation will help get the article approved. 11:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC) PinginToWorld (talk) 11:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well... no. They have no bearing on the draft's approval prospects. They may also get deleted at some point, as they're not really needed yet, but I don't really deal with either templates or cats, so will leave that for others to worry about. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the information. PinginToWorld (talk) 15:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: KeyQaad (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QueerEcofeminist was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please rework the draft as per earlier suggestion and do not resubmit before working on it. Thanks

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KeyQaad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QueerEcofeminist🌈 03:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kourage BeatZ NSI

Hi @PiginToWorld I saw your edits on KeyQaad by going to how Nigerian related articles are been published. Please do you think Draft:Kourage BeatZ NSI edits is can be published. Scrobb (talk) 09:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Kourage BeatZ NSI looks good but you have to add more reliable source. PinginToWorld (talk) 11:27, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KeyQaad moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to KeyQaad. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you PinginToWorld (talk) 09:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moving

Please don't move drafts into the main space, like you did eg. with Sounds Cool and NSI Nation, when they provide no evidence of notability, and have already been repeatedly declined at AfC for that reason. Such articles will only be moved back to drafts, or else deleted, which is in no one's interests. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I thought they meet the criteria for the it. I'm sorry for not careful check and using tools that I'm not supposed to. I guess I will go back and learn more about it. Thanks for letting me know. PinginToWorld (talk) 09:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 09:43, 17 June 2024 edit DoubleGrazing (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 109,248 edits →‎Moving: new section Tag: New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:47, 17 June 2024 edit undo PiginToWorld (talk \| contribs) 85 edits →‎Moving: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 91:		Line 91:

	Please don't move drafts into the main space, like you did eg. with [[Sounds Cool]] and [[NSI Nation]], when they provide no evidence of notability, and have already been repeatedly declined at AfC for that reason. Such articles will only be moved back to drafts, or else deleted, which is in no one's interests. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing\|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing\|talk]]) 09:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)		Please don't move drafts into the main space, like you did eg. with [[Sounds Cool]] and [[NSI Nation]], when they provide no evidence of notability, and have already been repeatedly declined at AfC for that reason. Such articles will only be moved back to drafts, or else deleted, which is in no one's interests. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing\|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing\|talk]]) 09:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

			:Okay, I thought they meet the criteria for the it. I'm sorry for not careful check and using tools that I'm not supposed to. I guess I will go back and learn more about it. Thanks for letting me know. <span style="background: linear-gradient(to right, #00FF00, #0000FF, #FFFFFF); -webkit-background-clip: text; -moz-background-clip: text; background-clip: text; color: transparent;">PinginToWorld</span> ([[User talk:PiginToWorld\|talk]]) 09:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)