Template:Did you know nominations/Dreamtime (climb): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
hook |
re |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] article is long enough, recently promoted to GA and within policy. Hook is short enough and interesting. QPQ not needed.<span style="white-space:nowrap; font-family:Harlow Solid Italic;"><span style="font-size:small; color:teal;"> « Gonzo fan2007</span> [[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007|<small style="color:#2A2722">(talk)</small>]] @ </span> 21:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] article is long enough, recently promoted to GA and within policy. Hook is short enough and interesting. QPQ not needed.<span style="white-space:nowrap; font-family:Harlow Solid Italic;"><span style="font-size:small; color:teal;"> « Gonzo fan2007</span> [[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007|<small style="color:#2A2722">(talk)</small>]] @ </span> 21:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
::{{ping|Aszx5000|Gonzo_fan2007}} Comment: Seems like a bold claim. I wonder if we should attribute this claim or bolster it with more robust sources. Or explore a more verifiable hook. [[User:Bruxton|Bruxton]] ([[User talk:Bruxton|talk]]) 15:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
::{{ping|Aszx5000|Gonzo_fan2007}} Comment: Seems like a bold claim. I wonder if we should attribute this claim or bolster it with more robust sources. Or explore a more verifiable hook. [[User:Bruxton|Bruxton]] ([[User talk:Bruxton|talk]]) 15:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::"Considered" and "one of" make this less bold. I think the article supports both assertions, but if the nominator wants to add an additional source to back it up, it wouldn't hurt.<span style="white-space:nowrap; font-family:Harlow Solid Italic;"><span style="font-size:small; color:teal;"> « Gonzo fan2007</span> [[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007|<small style="color:#2A2722">(talk)</small>]] @ </span> 15:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
||
Revision as of 15:19, 18 June 2024
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Dreamtime (climb)
The line of the Dreamtime 8C (V15) graded bouldering route is marked in green
- ... that Dreamtime (pictured) is considered one of the world's most famous bouldering routes?
- Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Aszx5000 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Aszx5000 (talk) 15:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC).
article is long enough, recently promoted to GA and within policy. Hook is short enough and interesting. QPQ not needed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Aszx5000 and Gonzo fan2007: Comment: Seems like a bold claim. I wonder if we should attribute this claim or bolster it with more robust sources. Or explore a more verifiable hook. Bruxton (talk) 15:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- "Considered" and "one of" make this less bold. I think the article supports both assertions, but if the nominator wants to add an additional source to back it up, it wouldn't hurt. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Aszx5000 and Gonzo fan2007: Comment: Seems like a bold claim. I wonder if we should attribute this claim or bolster it with more robust sources. Or explore a more verifiable hook. Bruxton (talk) 15:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)