Jump to content

Talk:Haryanka dynasty: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
→‎Bengal: Reply
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
 
Line 21: Line 21:
{{ping|Teratix}} look at the map, the Haryana dynasty didn't rule over Bengal, where is the controversy? The lead literally says Magadha. At least have a base knowledge of Indian history before reverting me.[[Special:Contributions/193.60.198.37|193.60.198.37]] ([[User talk:193.60.198.37|talk]]) 14:34, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
{{ping|Teratix}} look at the map, the Haryana dynasty didn't rule over Bengal, where is the controversy? The lead literally says Magadha. At least have a base knowledge of Indian history before reverting me.[[Special:Contributions/193.60.198.37|193.60.198.37]] ([[User talk:193.60.198.37|talk]]) 14:34, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
:I admit, it was a poor revert. Apologies. Talk page discussion is never a bad thing. – [[User:Teratix|Tera]]'''[[User talk:Teratix|tix]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Teratix|₵]] 23:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
:I admit, it was a poor revert. Apologies. Talk page discussion is never a bad thing. – [[User:Teratix|Tera]]'''[[User talk:Teratix|tix]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Teratix|₵]] 23:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
::The real name of haryank Dynasty is nagvansh [[User:Mohit atulkar|Mohit atulkar]] ([[User talk:Mohit atulkar|talk]]) 18:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC)


== Religion ==
== Religion ==

Latest revision as of 18:55, 18 June 2024

Untitled[edit]

Following is a part from the article Shishunaga dynasty


both this haryanka dynasty and shishunaga are said to be the founder of magadha empire in 684 BC.. Which one is correct?--sunil 10:47, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits have been made. Haryanka is the correct founder succeeded by Shishunaga. Salilb (talk) 07:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pradyota dynasty[edit]

Where does the Pradyota dynasty fit into this chronology? I have added Pradyota dynasty to a new "See also" section, because I am uncertain where it fits into this Wikipedia article. The Wikipedia article about the Pradyota dynasty says: "most of the Puranas (except a manuscript of the Brahmanda Purana, preserved in the University of Dhaka) say that this dynasty succeeded the Barhadratha dynasty in Magadha". Does evidence prove that that is wrong, and that instead the Harynaka dynasty succeeded the Barhadratha dynasty?Anythingyouwant (talk) 01:43, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bengal[edit]

@Teratix: look at the map, the Haryana dynasty didn't rule over Bengal, where is the controversy? The lead literally says Magadha. At least have a base knowledge of Indian history before reverting me.193.60.198.37 (talk) 14:34, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I admit, it was a poor revert. Apologies. Talk page discussion is never a bad thing. – Teratix 23:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The real name of haryank Dynasty is nagvansh Mohit atulkar (talk) 18:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Religion[edit]

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=wPB7XoSiboUC&pg=PA92

As per this Haryanka dynasty were patrons of Buddism, Jainism, Hindiusm

Haryank Dynasty real name is nagvansh[edit]

The real name of haryank Dynasty is nagvansh Mohit atulkar (talk) 18:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]