Talk:Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 12:30, 30 June 2024

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.

summary of case

There is no summary of the case in the first paragraph. It is also followed by an long discussion of the prescedent.

It should be clear what the case was about in broad lines at the top. Bquast (talk) 12:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

in fact, the substance of the case is not discussed at all in the entire article Bquast (talk) 12:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 12:27, 30 June 2024 edit Bquast (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,403 edits →‎summary of case: new section Tag: New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:30, 30 June 2024 edit undo Bquast (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,403 edits →‎summary of case: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:

	It should be clear what the case was about in broad lines at the top. [[User:Bquast\|Bquast]] ([[User talk:Bquast\|talk]]) 12:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)		It should be clear what the case was about in broad lines at the top. [[User:Bquast\|Bquast]] ([[User talk:Bquast\|talk]]) 12:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

			:in fact, the substance of the case is not discussed at all in the entire article [[User:Bquast\|Bquast]] ([[User talk:Bquast\|talk]]) 12:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)