Jump to content

Talk:John Robert Seeley: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}.
 
Line 17: Line 17:
My source is The Expansion of England: Two Courses of Lectures 2005 Cosimo, Inc. under which it gives the original publisher details.
My source is The Expansion of England: Two Courses of Lectures 2005 Cosimo, Inc. under which it gives the original publisher details.
See page 8 for quote reference. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.1.87.234|82.1.87.234]] ([[User talk:82.1.87.234|talk]]) 03:22, 29 November 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
See page 8 for quote reference. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.1.87.234|82.1.87.234]] ([[User talk:82.1.87.234|talk]]) 03:22, 29 November 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:The correct quote is now in place, with citation link to Seeley's book in Internet Archive. [[User:Mrmedley|Mrmedley]] ([[User talk:Mrmedley|talk]]) 00:42, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:42, 6 July 2024


Untitled

[edit]

"Alibis" section Should be given header "Criticisms Of" or something similar, with criticisms attributed to prominent scholars and intellectuals (such as Dirks). As it stands, this section appears to be a criticism of Seeley's interpretation of imperial history by the entry itself. TimothyBurke (talk) 16:39, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Erroneous Quote and publishers date?

[edit]

In 'The Expansion of England: Two Courses of Lectures'. The 'famous quote' is not Seeley having said "The British Empire was acquired in a fit of absence of mind" it is "We seem, as it were, to have conquered and peopled half the world in a fit of absence of mind.".

The publisher date given should read 1891 by MacMillan & Co. in 1891.

My source is The Expansion of England: Two Courses of Lectures 2005 Cosimo, Inc. under which it gives the original publisher details. See page 8 for quote reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.87.234 (talk) 03:22, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The correct quote is now in place, with citation link to Seeley's book in Internet Archive. Mrmedley (talk) 00:42, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]