Talk:Hirose U.FL: Difference between revisions
Jim Grisham (talk | contribs) m →Add other similar connectors here (or somewhere else)?: replaced missing note template |
Jim Grisham (talk | contribs) m →Add other similar connectors here ''(or somewhere else)''?: Removed duplicate signature |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
{{notelist}} |
{{notelist}} |
||
- |
- [[User:Jim Grisham|Jim Grisham]] ([[User talk:Jim Grisham|talk]]) 00:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 00:35, 14 July 2024
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the Hirose W.FL page were merged into Hirose U.FL on 16 July 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Cleanup message
Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 23:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Done --Kvng (talk) 15:17, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Compatability
There are several connector styles that *look* quite similar. There is the GSC connector from Murata, the Sunridge MCF connector, the Hirose U.FL connector and UMCC connector (from Tyco / TE Connectivity). Apparently things arent complicated enough so the UMCC as well as the U.FL connector have different sub types:
UMCC has "Style A" and "Style B".
U.FL has female connector types
U.FL-LP-040
U.FL-LP(V)-040
U.FL-LP-062
U.FL-LP-066
U.FL-LP-088
which apparently all mate to its male counter part U.FL-R-SMT-1 [1]
UMCC Style A mates with UMCC Type II and III as well as Hirose U.FL(v)
UMCC Style B mates wit UMCC Type I as well as GSC [2]
Source:
[1]: http://www.hirose.co.jp/cataloge_hp/e32119372.pdf
[2]: http://www.te.com/commerce/DocumentDelivery/DDEController?Action=srchrtrv&DocNm=1307191_UMCC_Connectors&DocType=CS&DocLang=English&s_cid=1046
If someone could verify this (maybe all those connectors mate?), this information could be included in the article. --Moritz der Moralapostel (talk) 15:51, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Diameter is 2.0mm
There are various references to 1.9mm or 2.4mm, but those are the mated height, not the connector diameter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.176.98.26 (talk) 20:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
U. FL stands for ...
On this page we should be able to find what U. FL stands for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:14D:8000:6956:966:C625:97CC:5948 (talk) 01:57, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Merge W.FL
As the W.FL is probably a WP:PERMASTUB, I think it would make sense to merge it into this article. Initramfs (talk) 20:23, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 11:27, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Add other similar connectors here (or somewhere else)?
As the current article describes a connector compatible with the MHF1/MHF I ('Mobile High Frequency'??) connector, would it make sense to reference the newer variations as well, such as:
- MHF3/MHF III
- MHF4/MHF IV (apparently used by some M.2 WiFi5 cards such as the 'Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265')[a]
This information could also go on the List of RF connector types page, but at least two of the relevant 'Micro' connectors redirect to this article anyway.
- ^ Intel punts to the PCIe M.2 specs (current version paywalled; a copy of v1.0 is available) instead of directly describing which connectors it uses, only to mention that they are "2mm" connectors.