Template:Did you know nominations/SiegedSec: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Epicgenius (talk | contribs) review |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
--> |
--> |
||
* ... that [[NATO]] |
* ... that [[NATO]] was once targeted by a group of "'''[[SiegedSec|gay furry hackers]]'''"? |
||
{{smalldiv|1= |
{{smalldiv|1= |
||
* Source: https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/04/nato_data_attack/}} |
* Source: https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/04/nato_data_attack/}} |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
|sign = [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 18:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
|sign = [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 18:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
}} |
}} |
||
:{{Ping|Epicgenius}} Thanks for the review. I've changed the hook. <span style="display:inline-block;background:linear-gradient(to right,#24D628,#F934EF,#9F5300);padding:2px 10px;border-top-left-radius:15px;border-bottom-right-radius:15px;"><b>[[User:B3251|B3251]]</b></span>'''''[[User_talk:B3251|<sub>(talk)</sub>]]''''' 18:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
||
Revision as of 18:39, 14 July 2024
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
SiegedSec
- ... that NATO was once targeted by a group of "gay furry hackers"?
Moved to mainspace by B3251 (talk) and PixyPoxxy (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 18 past nominations.
B3251(talk) 17:37, 11 July 2024 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
- Personally, I'd format the "Notable attacks" section as prose, rather than as a bulleted list. As it is, the article has just over 1,500 prose characters, so this isn't a requirement, just a suggestion.
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems: - Although it is technically correct that NATO has been targeted by "gay furry hackers" in the past, the wording "has been" might mislead people into thinking that the hacking is currently ongoing. I'd suggest something along the lines of "... that NATO was once targeted by a group of "gay furry hackers"?".
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
@B3251 and PixyPoxxy: Nice work on this article. I had a few comments above, but otherwise there don't seem to be any other issues with this nomination. Epicgenius (talk) 18:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius: Thanks for the review. I've changed the hook. B3251(talk) 18:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)