Jump to content

Wilhelm Johannsen: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m date format audit, minor formatting
Nationality removed: obvious
 
Line 6: Line 6:
|birth_date = {{birth date|1857|02|03|df=y}}
|birth_date = {{birth date|1857|02|03|df=y}}
|birth_place = [[Elsinore]], [[Denmark]]
|birth_place = [[Elsinore]], [[Denmark]]
|nationality = [[Danish people|Danish]]
|death_date = {{death date and age|1927|11|11|1857|02|03|df=y}}
|death_date = {{death date and age|1927|11|11|1857|02|03|df=y}}
|death_place = [[Copenhagen]], Denmark
|death_place = [[Copenhagen]], Denmark

Latest revision as of 08:48, 23 July 2024

Wilhelm Ludvig Johannsen
Born(1857-02-03)3 February 1857
Elsinore, Denmark
Died11 November 1927(1927-11-11) (aged 70)
Copenhagen, Denmark
Alma materUniversity of Copenhagen
Known forproving the constancy of the genome
Coining gene, genotype and phenotype
Scientific career
FieldsGenetics
Plant physiology
InstitutionsUniversity of Copenhagen

Wilhelm Johannsen (3 February 1857 – 11 November 1927) was a Danish pharmacist, botanist, plant physiologist, and geneticist. He is best known for coining the terms gene, phenotype and genotype, and for his 1903 "pure line" experiments in genetics.

Biography

[edit]

Johannsen was born in Copenhagen. While very young, he was apprenticed to a pharmacist and worked in Denmark and Germany beginning in 1872 until passing his pharmacist's exam in 1879. In 1881, he became assistant in the chemistry department at the Carlsberg Laboratory under the chemist Johan Kjeldahl. Johannsen studied the metabolism of dormancy and germination in seeds, tubers and buds. He showed that dormancy could be broken by various anesthetic compounds, such as diethyl ether and chloroform.

In 1892, he was appointed lecturer at Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University and later became professor of botany and plant physiology. He taught plant physiology.[1] His best-known research concerned so-called pure lines of the self-fertile common bean. He was able to show that even in populations homozygous for all traits, i.e. without genetic variation, seed size followed a normal distribution. This was attributable to resource provision to the mother plant and to the position of seeds in pods and of pods on the plant. This led him to coin the terms phenotype and genotype.

Johannsen's findings led him to oppose contemporary Darwinists, most notably Francis Galton and Karl Pearson, who held the occurrence of normal distributed trait variation in populations as proof of gradual genetic variation on which selection could act.[2] Only with the modern synthesis, was it established that variation needed to be heritable to act as the raw material for selection.

He created the terms phenotype and genotype, first using them in his book in German as Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre (Elements of the exact theory of heredity).[3][4] This book was based in large part on Om arvelighed i samfund og i rene linier ("On heredity in society and in pure lines")[5] and in his book Arvelighedslærens Elementer.[6] It was in this book Johannsen also introduced the term gene.[7] This term was coined in opposition to the then common pangene that stemmed from Darwin's theory of pangenesis. The book became one of the founding texts of genetics.

Also in 1905, Johannsen was appointed professor of plant physiology at the University of Copenhagen, becoming vice-chancellor in 1917. In December 1910, Johannsen was invited to give an address before the American Society of Naturalists. This talk was printed in the American Naturalist.[8] In 1911, he was invited to give a series of four lectures at Columbia University.[9]

Johannsen was a corresponding member of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (elected 1915). He was elected to the American Philosophical Society in 1916.[10]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Warming, Eug. & W. Johannsen (1895) Den almindelige Botanik (General Botany): En Lærebog, nærmest til Brug for Studerende og Lærere. 3rd edn, Kjøbenhavn. 4th edn by Warming and Johannsen 1900-01). German edn 1907-09: Lehrbuch der allgemeinen Botanik (from the 4th edn, by E. P. Meinecke). Berlin, Borntraeger. 667 pp.
  2. ^ Roll-Hansen, Nils (1979). "The Genotype Theory of Wilhelm Johannsen and its Relation to Plant Breeding and the Study of Evolution". Centaurus. 22 (3): 201–235. Bibcode:1979Cent...22..201R. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0498.1979.tb00589.x.
  3. ^ Johannsen, W. (1909). Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre [Elements of the exact theory of heredity] (in German). Jena, Germany: Gustav Fischer. p. 123. Johannsen distinguished between an organism's outward appearance (which he designated as its "phenotype") and its inherent genetic heritage (which he designated as its "genotype"). He stressed that an organism's appearance need not correspond exactly to its genetic heritage. So on p. 123 he defines "phenotype": "Darum könnte man den statistisch hervortretenden Typus passend als Erscheinungstypus bezeichnen oder, kurz und klar, als "Phaenotypus". 1) … Ein gebener Phaenotypus mag Ausdruck einer biologischen Einheit sein; er braucht es aber durchaus nicht zu sein. 1) Von φαίν-ομαι, scheinen." (Therefore one could designate the statistically prominent type appropriately as a type of appearance or, clearly and concisely, as a "phenotype". 1) … A given phenotype may be an expression of a biological unit; but it definitely need not be so. 1) From φαίν-ομαι, to appear.)
  4. ^ Johannsen, W. (1909). Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre [Elements of the exact theory of heredity] (in German). Jena, Germany: Gustav Fischer. p. 130. Johannsen coins the term "genotype" on p. 130, where he stresses the distinction between phenotype and genotype: "Die Art, wie die Phaenotypen sich manifestieren, … der abgeleitete Begriff genotypischer Unteschied wird uns aber vielfach von Nutzen sein." (The way that the phenotype manifests itself, whether it shows itself by traits that [can be] examined qualitatively or quantitatively, says absolutely nothing beforehand about the genes. Very conspicuous phenotypic differences could show themselves where no genotypic difference is present, and there are also cases where in the case of genotypic variety, the phenotypes are alike. Thus it is precisely of the greatest importance to separate clearly the concept of phenotype (a type of appearance) from the concept of genotype (one might say a type of plan). We will admittedly not be able to operate with this latter concept – a genotype just does not appear in pure form ; the derived concept of a genotypic difference will, however, often be of use to us.)
  5. ^ Johannsen, W. (1903) Om arvelighed i samfund og i rene linier. Oversigt over det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Forhandlinger, vol. 3: 247-270. German ed. Erblichkeit in Populationen und in reinen Linien (1903) Gustav Fischer, Jena. Scanned full text. Archived 30 May 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  6. ^ Johannsen, W.L. (1905) Arvelighedslærens elementer (The Elements of Heredity). Copenhagen.
  7. ^ Johannsen, W. (1909). Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre [Elements of the exact theory of heredity] (in German). Jena, Germany: Gustav Fischer. p. 124. From p. 124: "Dieses "etwas" in den Gameten bezw. in der Zygote, … – kurz, was wir eben Gene nennen wollen – bedingt sind." (This "something" in the gametes or in the zygote, which has crucial importance for the character of the organism, is usually called by the quite ambiguous term Anlagen [primordium, from the German word Anlage for "plan, arrangement ; rough sketch"]. Many other terms have been suggested, mostly unfortunately in closer connection with certain hypothetical opinions. The word "pangene", which was introduced by Darwin, is perhaps used most frequently in place of Anlagen. However, the word "pangene" was not well chosen, as it is a compound word containing the roots pan (the neuter form of Πας all, every) and gen (from γί-γ (ε)ν-ομαι, to become). Only the meaning of this latter [i.e., gen] comes into consideration here ; just the basic idea – [namely,] that a trait in the developing organism can be determined or is influenced by "something" in the gametes – should find expression. No hypothesis about the nature of this "something" should be postulated or supported by it. For that reason it seems simplest to use in isolation the last syllable gen from Darwin's well-known word, which alone is of interest to us, in order to replace, with it, the poor, ambiguous word Anlage. Thus we will say simply "gene" and "genes" for "pangene" and "pangenes". The word gene is completely free of any hypothesis ; it expresses only the established fact that in any case many traits of the organism are determined by specific, separable, and thus independent "conditions", "foundations", "plans" – in short, precisely what we want to call genes.)
  8. ^ Johannsen, W. (1911). "The Genotype Conception of Heredity". The American Naturalist. 45 (531): 129–59. doi:10.1086/279202. JSTOR 2455747. PMC 4258772. PMID 24691957.
  9. ^ Anon (1911). "Professor Johannsen's Columbia Lectures". Science. 34 (876): 484. doi:10.1126/science.34.876.484. JSTOR 1637692. PMID 17793952.
  10. ^ "APS Member History". search.amphilsoc.org. Retrieved 23 October 2023.

Sources

[edit]
  • Anker, Jean (1932) Wilhelm Johannsen, pp. 177–180 in: Meisen, V. Prominent Danish Scientists through the Ages. University Library of Copenhagen 450th Anniversary. Levin & Munksgaard, Copenhagen.
  • Roll-Hansen, Nils (1983) The Death of Spontaneous Generation and the Birth of the Gene: Two Case Studies of Relativism. Social Studies of Science 13 (4): 481–519. JSTOR 284846
  • Kim, Kyung-Man (1991) On the Reception of Johannsen's Pure Line Theory: Toward a Sociology of Scientific Validity. Social Studies of Science 21 (4): 649–679. JSTOR 285343
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wilhelm_Johannsen&oldid=1236174458"