Jump to content

User talk:SlimVirgin/History 2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jaber777 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
User:Sparkzilla
Line 127: Line 127:


Yeah, thanks for the help. [[User:Jaber777|Jaber777]] 11:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, thanks for the help. [[User:Jaber777|Jaber777]] 11:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

== User:Sparkzilla ==

Hi, I noticed you had some problems with [[User:Sparkzilla]] over a BLP-issue. I thought it might interest you that he is thought to have an undeclared CoI (not related to the BLP-issue, however). [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Metropolis_.28English_magazine_in_Japan.29__.28history.7CWatchlist_this_article.7Cunwatch.29_.5Bwatchlist.3F.5D.2C_Crisscross__.28history.7CWatchlist_this_article.7Cunwatch.29_.5Bwatchlist.3F.5D_and_Nick_Baker_.28prisoner_in_Japan.29__.28history.7CWatchlist_this_article.7Cunwatch.29_.5Bwatchlist.3F.5D] [[User:Heatedissuepuppet|Heatedissuepuppet]] 12:14, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:14, 18 May 2007


RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
HouseBlaster 106 7 1 94 00:50, 23 June 2024 2 days, 21 hoursyes report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 03:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, SV

Just wanted you to know I'm standing for bureaucrat again and you were one of the reasons. I noted your remark when I mentioned that your erstwhile bureaucrat was a moth. I thought it was very sweet and it reminded me how much I missed dealing with all the nice people in the community such as (obviously) your slim self. :) Cheers, Cecropia 04:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very glad to hear the moth wants to be a butterfly again. Do you think I could pass? We moths are always thrown out of the best butterfly clubs. ;-) -- `Cecropia 04:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Self-published sources

Could you weigh in on this discussion at WT:V? Jehochman / 15:12, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Distinctive fetures of the Holocaust

Well, I guess that my first foray on to the Holocaust page was rather minimalist. This was for several reasons:

  • I am still engage in a struggle with French Telecoms to get an ADSL line into our village house in the Gard. Until then, I am hobbled with a dial-up connection when we are there.
  • I wanted to start on the issue of uniqueness without waving a red cape, or getting involved in that sterile (and often demeaning) discussion about “ownership.” I do believe that it is very important to understand the uniqueness and in my experience it is one of the first questions that is asked by those new to the subject.

Thus I put in what seem to me to be the most important points with links to more detailed references. When efficiency and scale are the only reasons given, then the evil which was the foundation of the events risks being swept under the rug. After all for most efficiency and scale are not inherently evil.

I did want to add some other references, partularly one from Friedlander (the Years of Persecution, p. 149) about the decision to go to 3 of 4 grandparents, but the book was back in my office. To my delight, you referred to the long awaited second volume which I hadn’t realized was out. Did you buy it in the UK? Or do I have to order from the States. (I had the good luck to have him as a lecturer back in the Dark Ages of the 1960’s.) Joel Mc 16:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enough

I've called for a third party opinion. Please leave me alone until someone else adds their own input. I'm discussing this on the talk page as I always have. Marshall 19:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wow

I get a new computer and spend a couple of days away and all hell breaks loose! That is one long argument on the Factory Farming talk page!-Localzuk(talk) 19:36, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agriculture

I thought you may be interested in this article by Bernard Stiegler. Although brief, it requires some effort, but in my opinion this pays off. It places the debate you have been engaged in into a slightly different context. Anyhow, just a thought. When you get some time. FNMF 01:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/PalestineRemembered. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/PalestineRemembered/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/PalestineRemembered/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --Srikeit 05:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request

I own these pictures [1] [2] [3] [4]. I have them in my own private albums and I took them with my own camera. User:Hipocrite is attempting to provoke me by tagging them with "unfree image" tags. Help please. Jaber777 13:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thanks for the help. Jaber777 11:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sparkzilla

Hi, I noticed you had some problems with User:Sparkzilla over a BLP-issue. I thought it might interest you that he is thought to have an undeclared CoI (not related to the BLP-issue, however). [5] Heatedissuepuppet 12:14, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]