User talk:Bookuser: Difference between revisions
GearedBull (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
==[[Boston]] article== |
==[[Boston]] article== |
||
Hi Bookuser, I was curious if you intended to delete, or only move, the book you deleted on the article Boston. [[User:GearedBull|CApitol3]] 17:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC) |
Hi Bookuser, I was curious if you intended to delete, or only move, the book you deleted on the article Boston. [[User:GearedBull|CApitol3]] 17:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
-hi, i meant to delete it. as i mentioned in the note, it should have been in a 'further reading' section rather than a 'reference' section. i'd accidentally added this a while back into the references section. since Boston doesn't have a further reading section, i thought it'd be better to just remove it. thanks [[User:Bookuser|Bookuser]] 19:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:35, 29 May 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
|
MIT Press books
Please read WP:COI, WP:EL, and WP:SPAM concerning your repeated additions of MIT Press books and http://mitpress.mit.edu links to articles. Thanks. --Ronz 19:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
I've asked for help in addressing the issues I mentioned above:Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#User:Bookuser. --Ronz 19:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Boston article
Hi Bookuser, I was curious if you intended to delete, or only move, the book you deleted on the article Boston. CApitol3 17:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
-hi, i meant to delete it. as i mentioned in the note, it should have been in a 'further reading' section rather than a 'reference' section. i'd accidentally added this a while back into the references section. since Boston doesn't have a further reading section, i thought it'd be better to just remove it. thanks Bookuser 19:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)