Jump to content

Short-term memory: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Arcadian (talk | contribs)
fix typo in last edit
EvilReborn (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Short-term memory''', sometimes referred to as "primary," "working," or "active" memory, is that part of [[memory]] which is said to be able to store 7 plus or minus 2 bits of information for about 20 seconds. This can be contrasted to [[long-term memory]], in which a seemingly unlimited amount of information is stored indefinitely. It can be described as the capacity (or capacities) for holding in [[mind]], in an active, highly available state, a small amount of [[information]].
'''Short-term memory''', sometimes referred to as "primary," "working," or "active" memory, is that part of [[memory]] which is said to be able to store 7 ± 2 bits of information for about 20 seconds. This can be contrasted to [[long-term memory]], in which a seemingly unlimited amount of information is stored indefinitely. It can be described as the capacity (or capacities) for holding in [[mind]], in an active, highly available state, a small amount of [[information]].


The information held in short-term memory may be: recently processed [[sense|sensory input]]; items recently retrieved from [[long-term memory]]; or the result of recent mental [[processing]], although that is more generally related to the concept of [[working memory]].
The information held in short-term memory may be: recently processed [[sense|sensory input]]; items recently retrieved from [[long-term memory]]; or the result of recent mental [[processing]], although that is more generally related to the concept of [[working memory]].

Revision as of 21:55, 8 June 2007

Short-term memory, sometimes referred to as "primary," "working," or "active" memory, is that part of memory which is said to be able to store 7 ± 2 bits of information for about 20 seconds. This can be contrasted to long-term memory, in which a seemingly unlimited amount of information is stored indefinitely. It can be described as the capacity (or capacities) for holding in mind, in an active, highly available state, a small amount of information.

The information held in short-term memory may be: recently processed sensory input; items recently retrieved from long-term memory; or the result of recent mental processing, although that is more generally related to the concept of working memory. (Many often refer to the short-term memory as the "working memory")

Existence of a separate store

It is generally considered that some or all memories pass from a short-term to a long-term store after a small period of time, a model referred to as the "modal model" and most famously detailed by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968). The exact mechanisms by which this transfer takes place, whether all or only some memories are retained permanently, and indeed the existence of a genuine distinction between the two stores, remain controversial topics among experts.

One form of evidence, cited in favor of the separate existence of a short-term store is that anterograde amnesia, the inability to learn new facts and episodes, affects long-term memory while leaving short-term memory intact (a famous example is patient HM). Other evidence comes from experimental studies showing that some manipulations (e.g., a distractor task following learning) affect only memory for the 3 to 5 most recently learned words of a list (presumably still held in short-term memory), whereas other manipulations (e.g., semantic similarity of the words) affect only memory for earlier list words (Davelaar et al., 2005).

Relationship to working memory

The relationship between short-term memory and working memory is differently described by various theorists, but it is generally acknowledged that the two concepts are distinct. Working memory is a theoretical framework that refers to structures and processes used for temporarily storing and manipulating information. As such, working memory might also just as well be referred to as working attention. Short-term memory generally refers in a theory-neutral manner to the short term storage of information. Thus while there are short-term memory components to working memory models, the concept of short-term memory is distinct from these more hypothetical concepts. Within one influential model of working memory (Baddeley, 1986) there are two short-term storage mechanisms: the phonological loop and the visuospatial sketchpad. Most of the research referred to here involves the phonological loop, because most of the work done on short-term memory has used verbal material.

Duration of short-term memory

The most important characteristic of a short-term store is, clearly, that it is short-term — that is, it retains information for a limited amount of time only. Most definitions of short-term memory limit the duration of storage to less than a minute; no more than about 30 seconds, and in some models as little as 2 seconds. Some models limit short term memory to weeks. Memory that exceeds short-term memory duration limits is known as long-term memory.

In order to overcome this, and retain information for longer, information must be periodically repeated, or rehearsed — either by articulating it out loud, or by mentally simulating such articulation. In this way, the information will re-enter the short-term store and be retained for a further period. The process of consolidation (transfer of short-term memory to long term memory) is enhanced by the relationship, if any, of an item of short-term memory to an item in long-term memory (for example, if a sensory short-term event is linked to a trauma already in long-term memory).

The time to find a short term memory is reversely proportional to the recognition probability (see Tarnow, 2005).

Capacity of short-term memory

The second key concept associated with a short-term memory is that it has a finite capacity. Prior to the creation of current memory models, George Miller argued that human short-term memory has a forward memory span of approximately seven items plus or minus two (Miller, 1956).

Some authors have argued that even the general intelligence factor can be understood as the channel capacity of short-term memory. In the theoretical framework of information psychology mental power, or the capacity C of short-term memory (measured in bits of information), is the product of the individual mental speed Ck of information processing (in bit/s) (see the external link below to the paper by Lehrl and Fischer (1990)), and the duration time D (in s) of information in short-term working memory, meaning the duration of memory span. Hence:

C (bit) = Ck(bit/s) × D (s).

However, against the trend of the 1950s to understand cognition in an information theoretic context, Miller himself was in doubt that the capacity of short-term memory could be measured in such a way in terms of a constant amount of information, as expressed in bits. Miller argued that the unit of measurement for short-term memory capacity is a chunk. A chunk can be a single digit or letter, it can also be a word, a multiple-digit number or even a whole phrase if the number or the phrase form a unit already learned in long-term memory before.

Chunking

Though the average person may only retain about 7±2 different units in his or her short term memory, chunking can greatly increase a person's recall ability. Through putting each unit into a meaningful word or phrase, a person's recall ability can skyrocket through practice. For example, in recalling a phone number, the person usually chunks the digits into three groups: first, the area code (such as 814), then a three digit chunk (123) and lastly a four digit chunk (4567). This method or remembering phone numbers is far more effective than attempting to remember a string of ten digits. In one testing session, an All-American cross country runner was able to recall a string of 73 digits after hearing them only once by chunking them into different running times (i.e. the first four number were 1518, a three mile time.) Source David G. Myers

Chunking is one way to help keep things fresh in the short term memory, however there are ways to lose information quicker as well. One example of this is called interference. Interference is something that distracts a person from being able to rehearse information given to them to be remembered. This can cause a person to lose the given information much quicker than someone able to rehearse as much as they want.

See also


References

  • Atkinson, R. C. & Shiffrin, R.M. (1968): Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes - In K.W. Spence & J.T. Spence (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol 2. London: Academic Press.
  • Davelaar, E. J., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., A., A., Haarmann, H. J., & Usher, M. (2005): The demise of short-term memory revisited: empirical and computational investigation of recency effects. Psychological Review, 112, 3-42.
  • Lehrl, S., & Fischer, B. (1988): The basic parameters of human information processing: their role in the determination of intelligence. Personality and individual Differences., 9, 883 - 896. ([1])
  • Miller, G. (1956): "The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information", Psychological Review, vol. 63 pp. 81-97 [2]
  • Schacter, D. L. (1997): Searching for Memory: The Brain, the Mind, and the Past. ISBN 0-465-07552-5.
  • Tarnow, Eugen (2005): The Short Term Memory Structure In State-Of-The Art Recall/Recognition Experiments of Rubin, Hinton and Wentzel. http://cogprints.org/4670/