User talk:Lilkunta

lilkunta Archives: Archive 1___Archive 2___Archive 3___Archive 4___Archive 5___Archive 6

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Lilkunta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

There havent been problems with my edits/changes/additions (except Angelina Jolie page).

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=There havent been problems with my edits/changes/additions (except Angelina Jolie page). |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=There havent been problems with my edits/changes/additions (except Angelina Jolie page). |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=There havent been problems with my edits/changes/additions (except Angelina Jolie page). |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lilkunta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Time has passed. I have things to add 2 wiki.

Decline reason:

No reason to believe your disruption would not continue if you were unblocked. — Yamla 01:07, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lilkunta, I'm not an admin or anything, just chipping in with my opinion, but as far as I am aware, you have been blocked four times by three different admins, and according to the block log, not once have you been blocked for deleting anything. Yet in your unblock reasons, you continually say you didn't delete anything. You haven't been blocked for deleting things, you have been blocked for disruption. --Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 16:09, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

'darth' blocked saying I deleted comments which I didnt. I archived the comments. She didnt look b4 she leaped and just unfairly blocked w/o knowing the whole story ! If she had checked--which 1 is supposed to 2 b4 u just block some 1-- she woulda seen this !_ Lilkunta 00:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

According to the block log, and the block template she put on your talk page, your block was not for "deleting messages", but as I say in the message you just responded to, it was for disruption, and reluctance to co-operate (largely with regards to your font, I assume). This is how I see it. If you can find proof that shows that you were blocked for "deleting messages" (as you keep insisting), then please show it to me. --Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 01:07, 27 July 2007 (UTC)