Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gandhigiri: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
merge and rmv unrelated re: Wikipedia:No personal attacks and Wikipedia:Civility
Line 11: Line 11:
*'''Keep''' I wouldn't have thought so , but the article seems to be a bout a notable subject, and adequately documented. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 07:06, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' I wouldn't have thought so , but the article seems to be a bout a notable subject, and adequately documented. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 07:06, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' The article is well referenced and is on a notable subject.[[User:Shyamsunder|Shyamsunder]] 20:03, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' The article is well referenced and is on a notable subject.[[User:Shyamsunder|Shyamsunder]] 20:03, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
::'Notable subject'? Who/what is the subject of the article? If you think 'Gandhi' is, then why not redirect it to the synonym of the neologism 'Gandhigiri' to '[[Gandhism]]'? You can merge [[Gandhigiri]] to [[Gandhism]]. That would be the best decision. Defending such newly-coined neologisms would encourage people like [[User:Classicfilms]] to start more and more articles on not-at-all notable subjects. She has started stubs on all the books she has seen (yeah, 'seen'), eg [[Hitchhiker's Guide to the Internet]] (created in Dec 2006 and still empty)[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_the_Internet&action=history] , [[Whole Internet User's Guide and Catalog]] and [[Scientific American Special Issue on Communications, Computers, and Networks]] to name a few. Is [[Ed Krol]] (who's he?! only [[User:Classicfilms]] would know) paying people to edit Wikipedia for advertising him and his nonnotable works? I think I should remind her of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28books%29#Criteria book notability criteria]. -- [[User:Ranvir Sena|Ranvir Sena]] 10:09, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
::'Notable subject'? Who/what is the subject of the article? If you think 'Gandhi' is, then why not redirect it to the synonym of the neologism 'Gandhigiri' to '[[Gandhism]]'? You can merge [[Gandhigiri]] to [[Gandhism]]. That would be the best decision. -- [[User:Ranvir Sena|Ranvir Sena]] 10:09, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
* '''Merge''' with [[Gandhism]]/[[Lage Raho Munna Bhai]]. Not much notability beyond the film. [[User:Utcursch|utcursch]] | [[User talk:Utcursch|talk]] 12:10, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
* '''Merge''' with [[Gandhism]]/[[Lage Raho Munna Bhai]]. Not much notability beyond the film. [[User:Utcursch|utcursch]] | [[User talk:Utcursch|talk]] 12:10, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
::No notability beyond the film. -- [[User:Ranvir Sena|Ranvir Sena]] 12:39, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
::No notability beyond the film. -- [[User:Ranvir Sena|Ranvir Sena]] 12:39, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' in line with [[Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms]]. -[[User:Classicfilms|Classicfilms]] 16:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:14, 7 August 2007

Gandhigiri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

This article is on a 'newly-coined neologism', a criterion for deletion. Please do not forget that Wikipedia is not a dictionary. It is recommended that some part of this article be merged into Lage Raho Munna Bhai, especially that United States Citizenship and Immigration Services bit. See WP:NEO. Ranvir Sena 09:16, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'Notable subject'? Who/what is the subject of the article? If you think 'Gandhi' is, then why not redirect it to the synonym of the neologism 'Gandhigiri' to 'Gandhism'? You can merge Gandhigiri to Gandhism. That would be the best decision. -- Ranvir Sena 10:09, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No notability beyond the film. -- Ranvir Sena 12:39, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]