Jump to content

Talk:SummerSlam (2007): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Automatically signing comment made by Chicablog
No edit summary
Line 61: Line 61:


Lance Cade and Trvor Murdoch def. Paul London and Brian Kendrick [[User:gravediggerfuneral|gravediggerfuneral]]
Lance Cade and Trvor Murdoch def. Paul London and Brian Kendrick [[User:gravediggerfuneral|gravediggerfuneral]]

== CM Punk vs John Morrison ==
Tell me someone did couln't have noticed that.

Revision as of 01:03, 27 August 2007

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconProfessional wrestling Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconSummerSlam (2007) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diva Battle Royal

The SummerSlam page says: "...William Regal...arranged for a Battle Royal among all WWE Divas..." So should we leave out the individual names? Stormin' Foreman 02:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WWE.com has announced which Divas will participate. If more are announced, they will be added to the article.-- bulletproof 3:16 02:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On the graphic shown towards the end of RAW during the rundown of SummerSlam matches, Kristal was shown as one of the participants. Should she be added now? Or should we just wait until the match happens at this Sunday? Virakhvar321 05:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MVP vs. Hardy

Hasn't that match been announced for SS yet? --Endlessdan 19:19, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe tonight. TonyFreakinAlmeida 20:25, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You mean Friday.Wrestlinglover420 21:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mvp vs. Hardy was not announced. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.110.82.251 (talk) 22:24, August 22, 2007 (UTC)

  • I heard that they could be teaming up soon, I dunno if now by JBL this past Friday Roxy 00:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Kane/Finlay

Just got back from Smackdown event. Kane/Finlay was announced. No MVP/Hardy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.110.43.240 (talk) 15:22, August 22, 2007 (UTC)

The Boogeyman vs Big Daddy V

This rivalry has been going on for over a month so it still may be added at the last second. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.172.61.190 (talk) 23:28, August 22, 2007 (UTC)

Jackass involvement

Shouldn't the cancelled Jackass participation still be noted for historical purposes? Early promitional material featured them. The poster with the cast and Umaga was even shown here until the Triple H one was released, and the brief teaser video ad was aired a few times, and is even on the Vengeance DVD I picked up this week. Sure it didn't happen, but it still noteworthy to document the publicized intention with as much as was promoted: "early promotional materials featured Jackass as being involved with the event in some capacity but was later cancelled before any details aside from their appearing were announced" seems fair to me CyclopsScott 23:48, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should. Jackass was supposedly the theme to it, but it might not be too relevant to the article though. It, although should be noted in the future trivia section. -- KBW1 05:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree..take this up with an Admin.--Hornetman16 (talk) 10:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No article should have a trivia section, and as for the whole jackass saga I suggest you RTFA. Darrenhusted 13:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Now thats un called for. Aren't these talk pages here to improve articles. What you did was not improvement. -- KBW1 02:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Have you read the archives? If not then it was called for. Darrenhusted 14:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The way he said it was "uncalled for". Have you read the Talk page guidlines? Be polite. -- KBW1 00:05, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have to agree that it was pretty rude. If you had said the same thing in a nicer way, then there wouldn't have been any problems, but now there is an offended user, and rightfully so. The civility policy exists for a reason. This is a top ten website, so there will always be people around who aren't aware of past discussions that have taken place about a certain subject. You should get into the habit of dealing with it nicely now, since being nice is more efficient, and if you continue to be impolite, then you will be wasting a bunch of your time, and other people's time in the long run. Peace, The Hybrid 06:18, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well said Hybrid. I shouldn't try to let it affect me though. I just don't want to have any problems and I want to try to keep our talk pages in order. Thanks. -- KBW1 05:57, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

jamie noble

vs hornswaggle —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.156.142.218 (talk) 22:19, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

They didn't say that they would wrestle at Summerslam, they just said the match would take place in the future. The Hybrid 22:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Match results in

Headline Planet is reporting the dark match results. Should this be added right now???

Lance Cade and Trvor Murdoch def. Paul London and Brian Kendrick gravediggerfuneral

CM Punk vs John Morrison

Tell me someone did couln't have noticed that.