Jump to content

User talk:Jothri: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
unblock reviewed
Jothri (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:


{{unblock-auto reviewed|68.45.212.33|Vandalism-only account|Ryulong|sig=-- [[User:Lucasbfr|lucasbfr]] <sup>[[User talk:Lucasbfr|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 21:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC)}}
{{unblock-auto reviewed|68.45.212.33|Vandalism-only account|Ryulong|sig=-- [[User:Lucasbfr|lucasbfr]] <sup>[[User talk:Lucasbfr|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 21:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC)}}

{{unblock|Im sorry i didn't mean to, i don't know why i did it. It wont happen again. I was stupid, but i promise it wont happen again}}

Revision as of 22:01, 18 September 2007

Speedy deletion of Jothri

A tag has been placed on Jothri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Moonriddengirl 19:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

how do i retrive my wiki page

Welcome!

Hello, Jothri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

- STORMTRACKER Stormtracker94 19:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message on my talk page. The article was deleted because it met WP:CSD#A7. It has already been deleted today by another user for the same reason. This, I would suggest, you should take to mean that the article shouldn't be recreated without addressing these concerns.

If you want to retrieve the content of the article without recreating it then I will be happy to help you with that by supplying you with the information. Could you clarify what it is you want? Regards. Adambro 19:56, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jothri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Jothri. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. --YbborTalk 20:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Jothri (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
68.45.212.33 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Vandalism-only account


Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- lucasbfr talk 21:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Jothri (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Im sorry i didn't mean to, i don't know why i did it. It wont happen again. I was stupid, but i promise it wont happen again

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Im sorry i didn't mean to, i don't know why i did it. It wont happen again. I was stupid, but i promise it wont happen again |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Im sorry i didn't mean to, i don't know why i did it. It wont happen again. I was stupid, but i promise it wont happen again |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Im sorry i didn't mean to, i don't know why i did it. It wont happen again. I was stupid, but i promise it wont happen again |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}