Wikipedia:Editor review/Thedjatclubrock

thedjatclubrock

thedjatclubrock (talk · contribs) I want to know how I can Improve and what others think of me. Thinking of future adminship. Thanks,Thedjatclubrock :) ^(T/C) 14:14, 19 August 2007 (UTC).

Reviews

• Well here goes my review based on your desire to seek adminship in the future:

Major areas-

1. Wikipedia space: You adequately are familiar with Wikipedia space (such as using WP:AIV, WP:RFPP, participating in AfD/XfDs, etc.) However, you might want to increase your involvement in deletion debates if you are seeking adminship (the deletion process is vital to be familiar with if you are considering adminship). On the other hand I can tell you are familiar with the CSD process, which is a good thing.
2. Article space: You are a sensational recent changes patroller and wikignomer! Article contributions might be a minor issue.
3. Civility: From my interactions with you, I have determined you to be a very civil and level-headed editor. I can't seem to find any recent incivility issues in your contribution history which is great!

Minor areas-

1. Edit summary usage: According to this you definitely need to increase your edit summary usage for major edits. Edit summaries help others easily identify any certain changes and helps you easily browse through your contribution history when you need to refer to something.
2. Signature: Your signature completely abides by WP:SIG and is contained in a neat line.

Thus concludes my review!¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 21:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Comment I have a minor concern. You put this tag - {{db|Not A real place/nonsense.See Oh crap as motto.}} on Ohcrapistan. This is a manual tag, albeit a speedy, whereas {{db-nonsense}} is more concise. When tags already exist, I think they should be used and in the case of patent nonsense, an admin can easily see this and does not require an explanation. Good luck with your RfA! --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 02:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

• View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   I am proud of all my contributions and think that any contribution that makes wikipedia a better encyclopedia is crucial and equally important. I think reverting vandalism can be as important as rewriting an article.

Misrepresentation

I heard you misrepresented me by reporting me as a vandalism-only account because I lost my temper during an ongoing editing war. I lost my temper yes, but that does NOT make me a vandal. I contribute regularly to wikipedia in good faith.Rglong 07:14, 16 October 2007 (UTC)